find_images_with_gps_exif

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only states what it does without disclosing side effects, permissions, or error behavior (e.g., non-existent folder). Minimal disclosure for a read-only search.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is concise but lacks detail; it is not verbose, but it under-specifies for a tool with three parameters.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations and 0% schema description coverage, the description fails to explain parameters, output, or usage context, leaving significant gaps for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%; description does not explain any of the three parameters (folder_path, recursive, extensions) beyond the implicit mention of 'one folder'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states action 'find' and resource 'images with GPS EXIF fields' in 'one folder', distinguishing it from siblings like 'find_images_with_exif_fields' (any EXIF) and 'has_gps_exif' (single image).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives; lacks context for selecting between sibling tools like 'find_images_with_exif_fields' or 'has_gps_exif'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.