Get VWO workspace details

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds value beyond annotations: it specifies the exact fields returned (name, timezone, company info, enabled status). The annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the description supplements with concrete output details without contradicting them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence of 18 words. It front-loads the action and summarizes what the tool returns without any extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple retrieval tool with only two optional parameters and no output schema, the description adequately covers the expected return values. No missing critical details for an agent to understand the tool's function.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema documentation covers both parameters fully with detailed descriptions. The tool description does not add new meaning beyond the schema, but it lists the output fields, which is helpful. Baseline of 3 is appropriate given 100% schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses 'Get details of a single VWO workspace' which clearly states the action and resource. It lists specific attributes (name, timezone, company info, enabled status) and the tool name reliably implies retrieval, distinguishing it from sibling tools like vwo_list_workspaces (list) or vwo_new_workspace (create).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions. However, the purpose is clear enough that an agent can infer it is for retrieving a single workspace when the identifier is known, distinguishing it from listing or mutation tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.