A
licenseA
qualityC
maintenanceMCP server for interacting with GitHub Pull Requests, enabling listing, viewing, commenting, reviewing, and merging PRs.
6
64 npm
2
MIT
github-pr-control-mcp
by nexicturbo
Related Servers
Alternatives to github-pr-control-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with GitHub pull requests and issues via natural language. Provides tools to list PRs, inspect diffs, check CI status, and post review comments with write-safety guards.-
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA production-ready MCP server for GitHub operations, providing tools for repository management, issues, pull requests, and more via both MCP stdio and REST API.27MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA minimal MCP server that exposes a focused set of GitHub PR review tools to AI agents, enabling PR listing, detail retrieval, comment viewing, and thread management.5-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides operational tooling over the GitHub API — issue triage, PR review monitoring, repo health audits, and team access reviews.111MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for automated code review of GitHub pull requests. It checks security, quality, and license issues, and provides tools to list, inspect, and review PRs.16 npmMIT
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 8 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Most tools are clearly distinct, but submit_review and request_changes overlap significantly since request_changes is just a specific review type. Similarly, post_review_comment vs. submit_review with COMMENT type could cause confusion. Descriptions help, but these boundary areas could lead to misselection.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (list_prs, get_pr_diff, submit_review, add_labels). No mixed conventions or stylistic deviations appear.
Tool Count5/5
8 tools is well-scoped for a pull-request control server, covering list, get, diff, comments, reviews, and labels without unnecessary bloat.
Completeness4/5
The set thoroughly covers review workflows (comments, reviews, labels) and basic read operations, but lacks PR update, merge, or close operations, which are minor gaps for a 'control' server.
Maintenance
ActivityStale
ResponsivenessNo issues