freee-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to freee-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceattendance-engine-mcp is a Model Context Protocol server that gives AI agents deterministic, fixture-backed tools for workforce attendance and wage-and-hour compliance. Built on @attendance-engine/core — a pure-function, zero-deps, 100%-covered TypeScript engine — it lets Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, or any MCP host correctly answer the questions HR/payroll teams actually ask: did this person clock i87 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables managing freee HR operations like employee data, attendance, leave, and approvals through natural language in MCP-compatible clients such as Claude Desktop.1-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that automates TimeCard timesheet management using Playwright browser automation. It enables users to manage projects, activities, and daily hours entries through natural language interactions.63MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA modular MCP server integrating Clockify, WakaTime, and Azure DevOps for time tracking, work item management, and time logging via a unified API.2-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for managing Kaiten tasks through AI agents like Claude, enabling task retrieval, creation, updating, and time logging.27 npm2MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Clockify time tracking, enabling CRUD operations on workspaces, projects, tasks, clients, tags, users, and time entries.36MIT
TDQS
Scored across 27 tools
The tool set uses clear domain segments (clock, monthly, personal_application, approval), and every prepare/commit pair is explicitly documented as read/preview vs. actual write. However, the high number of similar 'prepare_action'/'commit_action' names—especially monthly_prepare_action vs. monthly_approval_prepare_action—means an agent must rely heavily on descriptions to avoid misselection.
Names follow a consistent freee_<domain>_<operation> snake_case pattern with predictable status/list/detail/options/prepare/commit vocabulary. Minor inconsistencies like freee_me and the plural/singular alternation between freee_personal_applications_list and freee_personal_application_detail keep it from a perfect score.
At 27 tools, the surface exceeds the 25-tool 'too many' threshold. The prepare/commit safety split doubles the number of tools for what are often the same logical actions, making the set feel heavy even though the underlying HR workflow is broad.
The server covers the main employee application lifecycle (create, read, cancel, withdraw), clock punches, monthly attendance submission, and approval/return workflows with strong safety checks. It still lacks a direct update/edit tool for personal applications and an explicit punch-history read, though these are minor gaps.