Skip to main content
Glama
newbdez33

freee-mcp

by newbdez33
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to freee-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • attendance-engine

      arifur9993
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      attendance-engine-mcp is a Model Context Protocol server that gives AI agents deterministic, fixture-backed tools for workforce attendance and wage-and-hour compliance. Built on @attendance-engine/core — a pure-function, zero-deps, 100%-covered TypeScript engine — it lets Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, or any MCP host correctly answer the questions HR/payroll teams actually ask: did this person clock i
      8
      11 npm
      1
      MIT

    • freee-hr-mcp

      0xkohe
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables managing freee HR operations like employee data, attendance, leave, and approvals through natural language in MCP-compatible clients such as Claude Desktop.
      1
      -

    • mitra-mcp

      thegauravgiri
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A modular MCP server integrating Clockify, WakaTime, and Azure DevOps for time tracking, work item management, and time logging via a unified API.
      2
      -

    • kaiten-mcp

      Happiest-d
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing Kaiten tasks through AI agents like Claude, enabling task retrieval, creation, updating, and time logging.
      18 npm
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Many prepare/commit pairs and multiple approval layers (generic approvals, monthly approvals, personal applications) overlap, so an agent must parse long descriptions to know which tool applies. Individual pairs are distinct, but generic vs monthly approval tools and several list/detail tools can be confused.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use the freee_ prefix and snake_case with domain/action segments, making the set mostly predictable. Minor deviations exist in pluralization and action labels, such as personal_application_detail vs personal_applications_list and prepare_create vs prepare_action.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 28 tools, the server exceeds the typical well-scoped range and includes many paired prepare/commit variants for similar operations. The domain is complex, but the count is still heavy and increases selection burden.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers auth/status, clock punches, leave balances, personal application list/detail/options and create/cancel/withdraw prepare/commit, approvals, and monthly approval workflows, giving broad lifecycle coverage. Only minor gaps like comment/route management or direct update of an existing application are apparent.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessWithin a week

    Resources