Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to freee-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      attendance-engine-mcp is a Model Context Protocol server that gives AI agents deterministic, fixture-backed tools for workforce attendance and wage-and-hour compliance. Built on @attendance-engine/core — a pure-function, zero-deps, 100%-covered TypeScript engine — it lets Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, or any MCP host correctly answer the questions HR/payroll teams actually ask: did this person clock i
      8
      7 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables managing freee HR operations like employee data, attendance, leave, and approvals through natural language in MCP-compatible clients such as Claude Desktop.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A modular MCP server integrating Clockify, WakaTime, and Azure DevOps for time tracking, work item management, and time logging via a unified API.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing Kaiten tasks through AI agents like Claude, enabling task retrieval, creation, updating, and time logging.
      27 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tool set uses clear domain segments (clock, monthly, personal_application, approval), and every prepare/commit pair is explicitly documented as read/preview vs. actual write. However, the high number of similar 'prepare_action'/'commit_action' names—especially monthly_prepare_action vs. monthly_approval_prepare_action—means an agent must rely heavily on descriptions to avoid misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names follow a consistent freee_<domain>_<operation> snake_case pattern with predictable status/list/detail/options/prepare/commit vocabulary. Minor inconsistencies like freee_me and the plural/singular alternation between freee_personal_applications_list and freee_personal_application_detail keep it from a perfect score.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 27 tools, the surface exceeds the 25-tool 'too many' threshold. The prepare/commit safety split doubles the number of tools for what are often the same logical actions, making the set feel heavy even though the underlying HR workflow is broad.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the main employee application lifecycle (create, read, cancel, withdraw), clock punches, monthly attendance submission, and approval/return workflows with strong safety checks. It still lacks a direct update/edit tool for personal applications and an explicit punch-history read, though these are minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues