note-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to note-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn unofficial MCP server that lets AI clients create and update article drafts on your own note.com account using session cookies.4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for automating article posting to note.com from Markdown files using Playwright.220 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for a JWT-authenticated note-taking API, exposing CRUD tools for notes.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceUnofficial read-only MCP server for LINE WORKS AiNote (AI meeting notes). Lists and searches notes and reads AI summaries and full transcripts; OAuth 2.0 with tokens stored in the OS keychain.4143 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceThe Universal MCP Server exposes tools for automated posting and draft saving to note.com. It reads Markdown files containing titles, body text, and tags, then publishes them to your note.com account using Playwright automation.220 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceUnofficial Notion MCP server built on Notion's private API (token_v2 cookie). Gives LLM agents full read/write access to the entire workspace — no integration token and no per-page sharing.1114 npm4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 19 tools
Several tool pairs overlap: note_prepare_draft vs note_create_draft, note_update_draft_bundle vs note_update_draft, and note_auth_status vs note_auth_check. While descriptions clarify differences, the naming and function similarity create ambiguity for agents selecting tools.
All tools share the note_ prefix and most follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., publish_draft, delete_note). However, auth-related tools use noun-like names such as note_auth_status, note_auth_check, and note_login_help, breaking the otherwise consistent pattern.
With 19 tools, this is on the heavier side. While the domain (note.com management) justifies many operations, the presence of both simple and bundled versions (create_draft/prepare_draft, update_draft/update_draft_bundle) adds redundancy and makes the count feel slightly inflated.
The toolset covers the full draft lifecycle (create, read, update, delete, publish), published note listing/retrieval/deletion, eyecatch upload, and authentication flows. Minor gaps include no magazine management or published-note editing, but core workflows are well covered.