champollion-sulcal-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to champollion-sulcal-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceExposes each stage of the Champollion sulcal embedding pipeline as MCP tools, enabling agents to run, monitor, and debug the pipeline without manual shell commands.17-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables orchestrator agents to route coding tasks to native CLI worker agents via MCP, providing tools for agent discovery, task submission, waiting, inspection, and cancellation.53MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides agentic MCP tools for the Flux Framework, enabling job submission, management, and resource scheduling for HPC workloads.164 PyPI1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceExposes DeepSeek Harness agent capabilities over MCP so any MCP client can delegate real coding work to a running agent with its full toolset (bash, filesystem, todo, web). Turns are dispatched asynchronously into sessions and then tracked through status, tail, wait, cancel, compact, and rename tools, with the session log as the source of truth so results survive restarts.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides browser automation, audio transcription, and LLM chat as MCP tools for any agent.7MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExposes task management (add, list, complete tasks) and document search (RAG) as MCP tools for AI agents.-
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct roles: stage launches are separated by stage number and resource, and job controls are status/list/cancel/log. Minor overlap exists between start_pipeline and the individual stage launchers, and between purge_subject and prune_failed_subjects, but descriptions make the distinctions clear.
Tool names are mostly consistent snake_case action-object patterns, especially the start_* stage launchers and job management verbs. preflight_check is a minor deviation from the verb_noun pattern but remains readable.
At 16 tools it is slightly heavy, but the count is justified by six pipeline stages, a full-pipeline launcher, configuration/training helpers, job management, cleanup, and informational tools. Each tool has a plausible role in the orchestration workflow.
The surface covers the main pipeline lifecycle well: preflight, all six stages, full pipeline execution, job status/list/cancel/log, cleanup, and pipeline info. Minor gaps remain, such as resume/retry operations and cleanup coverage outside cortical_tiles outputs.