A
licenseNot graded
qualityA
maintenanceA real-time MCP server that enables AI coding agents to read, write, and compile LaTeX projects in self-hosted Overleaf instances via native OT protocol.
500 npm
6
AGPL 3.0
overleaf-mcp
by netique
Related Servers
Alternatives to overleaf-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets Claude read, write, and push Overleaf LaTeX projects from the chat, with token-efficient features like sparse checkout and smart diffs.14MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with Overleaf projects, enabling project listing, file reads, LaTeX section discovery, and revision-guarded writes through natural language.AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides access to Overleaf projects via Git integration, enabling Claude and other MCP clients to read LaTeX files, analyze document structure, and extract content.7 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for agentic-first PDF review of LaTeX papers, enabling commenting, compiling, and visual inspection via Claude Code.7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for self-hosted Overleaf Community Edition that lets coding agents create projects, write LaTeX, compile, and receive structured diagnostics while humans edit the same document in the browser.810 npmMIT
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Scored across 17 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: project listing/opening, file reading/editing, find-and-replace, compile/log, comments (list/read/reply/resolve/reopen), and tracked changes (list/accept/reject). Even edit_file and find_and_replace are clearly differentiated by scope intent.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_projects, open_project, read_file, edit_file, compile, read_log, reply_comment, accept_changes). The compound find_and_replace is still in the same style. No mixing of conventions.
Tool Count4/5
At 17 tools, this is slightly above the typical 3-15 well-scoped range, but the breadth of Overleaf's collaboration and review features (comments, tracked changes, compile, log) justifies the count. Each tool earns its place.
Completeness3/5
The set covers the core editing and review workflows well: read/edit, compile, inspect log, manage comments and tracked changes. However, it lacks create/delete operations for projects and files, and there is no way to download the compiled PDF, leaving notable lifecycle gaps.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues