lantern-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to lantern-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides access to the impresso corpus of digitized historical newspapers, enabling article search with keyword-in-context snippets, filtering, facets, and source metadata retrieval.2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server and CLI for full-text search of the Deutsches Zeitungsportal (German newspaper collection), enabling querying ~33.8 million digitized pages with Solr syntax, date/title/place filters, and snippet highlights.3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for searching and retrieving full-text pages from the Library of Congress, including newspapers, books, and manuscripts, via the loc.gov API.3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables searching and accessing OCR text from millions of digitized documents in Gallica, the digital library of the Bibliothèque nationale de France, through MCP tools for text search, snippet retrieval, and full-text download.31Apache 2.0
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving historical records from the Library of Congress, including newspapers, photos, maps, manuscripts, audio, and film, via the Model Context Protocol.10-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables full-text search and retrieval of arXiv preprint papers by query or ID, with no authentication required.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one searches and returns excerpts, the other fetches full OCR text for a specific leaf. There is no ambiguity in their roles, and descriptions reinforce their complementary nature.
Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: search_lantern and get_lantern_text. Even though one adds a modifier, the verb-first structure and shared domain noun keep the naming uniform and predictable.
With only two tools, the set feels minimal — at the low end of what's useful. For such a narrow domain (searching and reading a specific archive), two might suffice, but it still borders on overly thin.
The workflow is complete for the core use case: search to locate relevant pages, then fetch full text when needed. Minor gaps exist, such as no way to browse volumes or get metadata, but these are not essential for typical search-and-read tasks.