Gemini MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| generate-planC | Use Gemini to generate a detailed plan for Claude Code to implement a task |
| gemini-consultB | Consult with Gemini when Claude needs help, additional context, or is stuck on a problem |
| analyze-codebaseC | Analyze codebase structure and patterns to understand how it works before implementing changes |
| strategic-planC | Create a high-level strategic roadmap for implementing complex features |
| review-approachB | Review and validate a proposed implementation approach before coding begins |
| generate-testsC | Generate comprehensive test strategies and plans for components, functions, or features |
| generate-docsB | Create documentation structure and content strategy for APIs, components, or systems |
| debug-assistC | Analyze errors and provide systematic debugging strategies and root cause analysis |
| explain-conceptC | Provide deep explanations of technical concepts, patterns, and technologies |
| compare-technologiesC | Compare different technologies, frameworks, or approaches for specific use cases |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Several tools occupy overlapping advisory/planning territory: generate-plan, strategic-plan, and review-approach all involve planning or validating approaches, while gemini-consult is a catch-all that could subsume many others. However, each tool has a somewhat distinct trigger (implementation plan vs. high-level roadmap vs. pre-coding review vs. debugging).
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (generate-plan, analyze-codebase, review-approach, generate-tests, generate-docs, debug-assist, explain-concept, compare-technologies). The main deviation is 'gemini-consult', which uses a product-prefix style rather than a plain verb, making it slightly inconsistent with the rest.
10 tools is within the ideal range and each covers a distinct assistance scenario. The count feels slightly high for what is essentially a consulting/assistant server, but it is still well-scoped and not bloated.
The server covers a broad range of assistance needs: planning, codebase analysis, approach review, testing, docs, debugging, concept explanation, and technology comparison. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no direct code generation or refactoring tool), but the surface is reasonably complete for a Gemini-assistant MCP server.