List Jmp Books

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description states the core behavior and a key output characteristic (page counts), but with no annotations it carries the full burden of disclosure. It does not explicitly say the operation is read-only, describe the return shape beyond page counts, or mention ordering or live/cached behavior. The output schema partially compensates for return details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler. It states the action, the resource, and the distinguishing output detail efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter list operation with an output schema, the description is sufficient. It identifies the exact scope ('JMP documentation books') and the expected content (page counts), leaving no essential detail missing for invoking the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. There is no parameter ambiguity, and the description does not need to explain parameter meanings beyond what the empty schema already establishes.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb ('List') and a specific resource ('JMP documentation books'), and adds the output detail 'with page counts.' This clearly distinguishes it from siblings like search_jmp_docs or get_jmp_page, which operate on different levels of content.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The intended use is implied: use this tool when the user wants an overview of available JMP documentation books. However, it does not explicitly contrast itself with sibling tools like browse_jmp_toc or search_jmp_docs, nor state when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.