forced_alignment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It mentions the operation and return type but does not disclose whether it is read-only, destructive, or any side effects. Lacks safety or behavior context beyond basic functionality.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is short, well-structured, and front-loaded with the main purpose. Each sentence (including args) adds value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations and two simple required params, the description provides minimal context. It doesn't mention prerequisites (e.g., audio format, file accessibility) or error handling. Output schema exists, so return details are covered, but completeness is otherwise lacking.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so description must define parameters. It provides brief definitions: 'path to the audio file' and 'the exact transcript of the audio.' These add basic meaning but lack formats, constraints, or examples, which would be needed for full clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool aligns a known transcript to audio and returns per-word/character timings. Verb 'align' is specific, and it distinguishes from transcription (speech_to_text) or generation (text_to_speech) tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use when transcript is known, but no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like speech_to_text or text_to_speech. No when-not or alternative mentions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.