A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceEnables AI assistants to record, analyze, and compare Xcode Instruments traces, detect performance bottlenecks and regressions, and provide optimization recommendations.
44
MIT
InstrumentsMCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to InstrumentsMCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceGives AI agents the ability to interact with iOS simulators through 21+ tools for mobile app testing.17,243 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language profiling of iOS apps using xctrace (Instruments) for performance analysis like launch time, memory leaks, CPU usage, and network requests.12-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to control iOS Simulators for UI/UX debugging, app management, and accessibility auditing via simctl, IDB, and ClaudeDebugKit.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI agents to control real iPhones and simulators on macOS, allowing for UI interaction, testing, and automation.33 npm87MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI to control iOS simulators through the MCP protocol. Supports device management, UI automation, and network interception including screenshot capture, text input, and HTTP request mocking.-
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 37 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, with categories for profiling, simulation, UI automation, and analysis. Descriptions are detailed and specify when to use each tool, minimizing confusion.
Naming Consistency5/5
Tool names follow a consistent prefix pattern (profile_, sim_, ui_, instruments_, performance_) with descriptive nouns, making the set predictable and easy to navigate.
Tool Count4/5
37 tools cover a broad domain including profiling, simulator control, UI automation, and analysis. While slightly high, each tool earns its place with a clear role, avoiding redundancy.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface is comprehensive, covering major profiling types, simulator operations, UI interactions, and analysis. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no dedicated real device profiling), but the core workflow is well-supported.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive