Skip to main content
Glama

Get frame at timestamp

video_get_frame
Read-onlyIdempotent

Extract a single JPEG frame at a timestamp from a video file or URL, returning the file path and an inline image to inspect a specific moment.

Instructions

Extract a single JPEG frame at a timestamp (seconds). Returns file path and an inline image for vision-capable clients.

Use after reading a transcript to inspect a specific moment.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sourceYesAbsolute local path, file:// URI, direct media URL, or platform URL (YouTube/TikTok/etc via yt-dlp)
time_secYesTimestamp in seconds
inline_imageNoInclude base64 image content block

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.3.0

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive behavior. The description adds useful behavioral context: the output is a JPEG, where it goes (file path), and that an inline image is included for vision-capable clients. This exceeds what annotations convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences with no redundancy. The core action and output are first, and the usage pointer is a concise second sentence. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only tool with rich annotations, the description covers the use case, output, and key format. It doesn't explain error cases or file path details, but with no output schema and three straightforward parameters, this is adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so parameters are fully documented in the schema. The description reinforces that time_sec is in seconds but doesn't need to add more; the schema already handles parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'Extract a single JPEG frame at a timestamp (seconds).' The 'single' qualifier distinguishes it from siblings like video_extract_frames and video_get_frame_burst, and it also clarifies the return (file path, inline image).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit usage context: 'Use after reading a transcript to inspect a specific moment.' This tells the agent when the tool is appropriate, though it doesn't name alternatives or exclusions explicitly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.