Kaiten MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Kaiten MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with Kaiten project management through its REST API. Enables managing spaces, boards, cards, comments, checklists, tags, and time logs.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for managing Kaiten tasks through AI agents like Claude, enabling task retrieval, creation, updating, and time logging.27 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Kaiten kanban boards, enabling task management via AI assistants like Cursor and Claude Code.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server and CLI tool for interacting with Kaiten project management API, optimized for token efficiency. Enables AI assistants to search, create, update, and manage tasks with minimal token usage.14 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for integrating Kaiten API with Claude Desktop, enabling management of cards, comments, spaces, and boards with advanced features like verbosity control, response format selection, and auto-truncation.14 npm31MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Kaiten project management, providing 63 tools for managing cards, comments, checklists, time tracking, and more. Enables AI assistants to interact with Kaiten workspaces through natural language.6314 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: list_columns, list_tasks, and list_boards are clearly separated read operations, while create_task, move_task, set_responsible, and add_comment cover distinct mutations. No two tools have overlapping purposes.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_*, create_, move_, set_, add_) using lowercase with underscores. The convention is uniform and predictable across the entire set.
With 7 tools, the server is well-scoped for a Kanban/board management domain. Each tool serves a clear core function without redundancy or bloat, fitting comfortably within the ideal 3-15 range.
The surface covers board/column/task listing, task creation, movement, commenting, and responsible-party assignment. However, there is no update tool for task title/description, no delete or archive operation (despite an archived filter existing), and no direct get-task-by-id, leaving notable lifecycle gaps.