A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceEnables Claude Desktop and MCP clients to interact with NEAR blockchain accounts for balance checks, account info, access keys, transaction status, and sending signed transactions.
MIT
NEAR MCP
Officialby nearai
Related Servers
Alternatives to NEAR MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceThe NEAR MCP Server enables AI agents to interact with the NEAR Protocol blockchain, providing smart contract interaction, transaction handling, and event listening with AI-driven processing.38 npm1ISC
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for interacting with liquid staking protocols on NEAR blockchain. Supports Meta Pool (stNEAR) and Linear Protocol (LiNEAR).6-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceFacilitates interaction with Starknet blockchain via MCP by exposing various RPC methods, allowing users to query chain states, transaction details, and block information using natural language queries.13 npm9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables cross-chain transactions (swap, send, balance) on 10 blockchains from a single NEAR account, designed for AI agents and humans via MCP.6Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with the Casper Network blockchain via MCP, providing tools for wallet creation, CSPR transfers, staking/delegation, and account queries.3MIT
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 23 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool belongs to a distinct category (account, contract, ref_finance, system, tokens, search) with clear action verbs. No two tools have overlapping purposes, making it easy for an agent to select the correct one.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools consistently use snake_case with a domain prefix (account_, contract_, etc.) followed by a verb_noun pattern. Even the longer names like contract_call_raw_function_as_read_only adhere to this pattern.
Tool Count4/5
23 tools cover account management, contract interaction, Ref Finance, token transfers, and system keystore operations. While slightly on the higher end, each tool serves a distinct purpose and the count is appropriate for the breadth of functionality.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers the most common NEAR operations: account lifecycle, key management, contract calling, token transfers, and Ref Finance. Minor gaps like contract deployment or staking are absent but do not hinder basic workflows.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive