Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Arkon

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides a self-hosted knowledge index with document-level permissions, enabling AI agents to retrieve exactly the documents they are authorized to see via MCP. Supports OAuth 2.1, custom embedding models, and runs inside your network.
      38 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP server for storing and serving structured team knowledge, enabling AI sessions to load relevant team context without re-prompting.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Self-hosted knowledge manager and MCP server that lets you organize snippets, questions, and documents via a web UI and exposes them to AI assistants for reading and writing.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Self-hosted RAG-powered knowledge base that surfaces context from structured notes and transcripts, exposing each project as an MCP tool.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Self-hostable, markdown-native team wiki with a built-in MCP server: agents search, read, and write your wiki pages (ranked Postgres full-text + semantic search, backlink traversal). Plus Atlas, which auto-generates a cited, coverage-checked wiki from your git repos and Jira.
      41
      69
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to search, read, and contribute to a structured markdown knowledge base with citations, freshness tracking, and a safe write path, providing a shared, auditable company memory.
      3 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool uses a clear verb_noun pattern (extract_content), and with only one tool, there are no inconsistent naming conventions.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool is on the thin side, but for a focused content extraction purpose, it can be acceptable. However, it lacks the typical 3-15 tool scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers the core function of extracting content from both URLs and files. Some potential advanced features are missing, but for the stated purpose, it is reasonably complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessResponsive