Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to codex-bridge

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables Claude Code to delegate tasks to Codex for real-time collaborative code generation and execution.
      11 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling Claude to consult Codex (GPT-5.x) mid-task for second opinions, plan/diff review, brainstorming, and codebase exploration via structured debates and permission-controlled interactions.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A MCP server that enables Claude Code to delegate coding tasks to Codex via the MCP protocol, with task management, security checks, and result verification.
      56 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that lets Claude delegate scoped work to Codex with structured results and guardrails, supporting planning, code review, build, reverse engineering, and long-running background tasks.
      11
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct interaction mode with Codex: brainstorming, debugging, planning, deep research, session reset, code review, risk analysis of diffs, session listing, and statistics. No overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'codex_' prefix with a descriptive verb or noun in snake_case (e.g., codex_ask, codex_research, codex_risk_radar). The pattern is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools, the set is well-scoped for its purpose. Each tool serves a clear function without redundancy, fitting the typical optimal range of 3–15 tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers major interaction types with Codex (ask, debug, plan, research, review, risk analysis) along with session management and stats. A minor gap is the absence of a direct 'codex_edit' or 'codex_refactor' tool, but core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues