cite-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to cite-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceCLI and MCP server for fetching multiple BibTeX options from Google Scholar's visible citation export flow.191MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceSearches academic references from arXiv, DBLP, Semantic Scholar, and OpenAlex concurrently and generates BibTeX citations.10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to access academic citations, fetch metadata, and generate BibTeX entries directly from Google Scholar via MCP tools.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAutomatically enriches BibTeX citations with missing metadata (DOI, venue, etc.) from arXiv, DBLP, and CrossRef via an MCP server for AI assistants.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying citation data from OpenCitations, including references, citations, citation counts, and bibliographic metadata for DOIs.15MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceResolves scholarly identifiers — DOI, PubMed ID, PMCID, ISBN, ISSN, arXiv, ADS bibcode — into clean, formatted citations in any of 10,000+ CSL styles. Returns plain text, HTML, Markdown, RIS, BibTeX, CSL-JSON, or EndNote XML for direct paste or reference manager import.73799MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: get_citeas_data retrieves a citation for a specific resource (DOI, URL, keyword), while get_scholar_data searches for multiple publications matching a query. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection unambiguous.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_citeas_data and get_scholar_data), using the same verb 'get' and a descriptive noun indicating the data source. The naming is predictable and uniform throughout the set.
With only two tools, the server feels thin for a citation management domain. While the tools cover basic retrieval from two sources, there are no operations for managing citations (e.g., save, update, delete) or handling metadata, which limits functionality for typical agent workflows.
The tool set is severely incomplete for citation management. It only provides retrieval from two sources, lacking essential operations like creating, updating, deleting, or organizing citations. There are no tools for formatting, exporting, or integrating with reference managers, leaving significant gaps in the domain coverage.