Universal Prompt Gate MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Universal Prompt Gate MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables autonomous agents and multi-agent frameworks to route actions through deterministic human approval gates before execution. Enforces risk tiers, reversible checkpoints, and token approval bounds so that risky or costly operations can be reviewed, bounded, and rolled back without LLM round-trips.7-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants like Cursor and Claude to engage in real-time two-way dialogue, allowing them to pause for clarification and request user confirmation before executing tasks. It features a modern UI for managing interaction prompts, predefined options, and project analysis to reduce errors and API costs.16MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to score, inspect, and gate tool calls before they execute, resolving shell commands the way a shell would in order to block destructive actions and detect multi-step attack sequences. It also redacts credentials and PII in either direction, requires signed single-use approval tokens for high-impact actions, and keeps a tamper-evident audit trail.611 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnforces team knowledge and workflow policies for AI coding agents by providing context, decisions, and gates before code changes are made.164Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables humans to review AI-generated code changes through a GUI: agents freeze git diffs and add findings/diagrams, while reviewers annotate and save decisions returned as an exact correction prompt.17257 npmISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables local, cross-provider preflight validation of LLM integration changes—model, prompt, structured-output, and provider-call modifications—with no-spend checks, evidence on speed, tokens, and cost, and explicit human approval before paid runs.375 PyPI3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
get_client_capabilities is clearly distinct as a capability probe. rewrite_prompt and review_and_select_prompt overlap in that both generate rewritten prompts, but the descriptions explicitly draw the line: rewrite_prompt produces an unapproved candidate while review_and_select_prompt runs the gated, user-confirmed flow. The boundary is documented, so misselection is unlikely but not impossible.
All names use snake_case with verb-first phrasing (get_*, rewrite_*, review_and_select_*), which is readable and mostly uniform. review_and_select_prompt is a compound verb phrase rather than a simple verb_noun, a minor deviation from the otherwise consistent pattern.
Three tools is a lean surface but each maps to a distinct stage of the workflow: capability discovery, candidate rewrite, and gated approval/selection. The count is slightly thin but well-scoped and nothing feels redundant or padded.
The lifecycle for a prompt-gate server is largely covered: negotiate capabilities, generate a rewrite, and handle user approval including a documented fallback for clients without elicitation. Minor gaps exist around configuration or non-elicitation batch handling, but core agent workflows are supported without dead ends.