Skip to main content
Glama
nbhson

Bitbucket MCP Server

by nbhson
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Bitbucket MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Bitbucket MCP Server

      zhanglc
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides tools for interacting with the Bitbucket API, supporting both Bitbucket Cloud and Bitbucket Server, enabling pull request, branch, file, code review, and search operations.
      19
      5,589
      MIT

    • Bitbucket MCP Server

      ATERCATES
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for integrating with Bitbucket Cloud and Server APIs, enabling AI assistants to interact with repositories, pull requests, pipelines, and more.
      59
      14
      3
      MIT

    • bitbucket-mcp

      matt-nann
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Bitbucket Cloud that enables reviewing, managing, and merging pull requests, assigning reviewers by name, reading files at a ref, and inspecting pipeline status from any MCP client.
      14
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but a few like 'grep' and 'search_code' could be confused as both perform code searches. Also, 'add_comment' vs 'manage_comment' are well-separated, but the distinction might not be immediately obvious.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming generally follows a verb_noun pattern in snake_case, e.g., create_branch, get_repo_commits. However, 'grep' deviates from the pattern, and 'list_pr_commits' uses an abbreviation instead of 'pull_request', creating minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 27 tools, the server covers a wide range of Bitbucket operations. While this is on the higher side, each tool has a specific purpose, and the count is justified for a comprehensive MCP server, with no obvious redundancies.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers core developer workflows: branches, commits, pull requests, files, and search. However, it lacks tools for creating/deleting projects or repositories, and tag management is limited to listing only. Notable gaps exist for full lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources