Skip to main content
Glama
nazaryanenko

scrivener-mcp

by nazaryanenko

Related Servers

Alternatives to scrivener-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides secure read-only access to a local folder, enabling file listing, reading, semantic search (RAG), and indexing status via natural language, integrated with Claude Desktop and a custom agent loop.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables Claude Desktop to search and read local documents via full-text and fuzzy search, providing direct access to indexed files without chunking.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server that gives Claude live access to your UE5 project state — Blueprints, interfaces, variables, functions, event graphs, materials, structs, and Data Assets.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct: read_document and read_chapter overlap somewhat (one reads a single document, the other an entire chapter), but descriptions clarify the difference. scan_project also overlaps with get_word_counts and list_binder, yet it provides a unique high-level overview, reducing confusion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (open_project, list_binder, read_document, get_synopsis, etc.). While verbs vary (open, list, read, get, search, scan), the structure is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the server is well-scoped for a Scrivener project interaction tool. Each tool covers a meaningful aspect of browsing, reading, searching, and managing project metadata without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set strongly favors reading and analysis, with only write_synopsis as a write operation. It lacks document editing, creation, deletion, or renaming, which are significant gaps for a writing application. Core read/search/scan workflows are covered, but the write surface is very limited.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues