Skip to main content
Glama
nayakprashant

Selenium MCP Server

by nayakprashant
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python

Related Servers

Alternatives to Selenium MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Selenium MCP Server

      PhungXuanAnh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for web automation using Selenium WebDriver, enabling AI assistants to navigate, interact with elements, take screenshots, and manage browser storage.
      11
      MIT

    • se-mcp

      se-cli
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for se-cli that exposes 50+ Selenium browser automation tools for AI agents, enabling browser control through a thin wrapper around se-cli.
      4 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • selagent

      akshay-rajan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Selenium-based MCP server that exposes browser automation tools for navigation, interaction, form filling, and assertions, enabling AI agents to control web browsers through natural language.
      GPL 3.0

    • Echo

      krishngohel
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local browser MCP server that lets AI assistants control a real desktop browser via tools like navigate, snapshot, and search_web.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clear distinct purposes, but get_interactive_elements and get_accessibility_tree serve similar functions (retrieving element info) with different output formats, which could cause agent confusion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., open_browser, get_page_text, click_element), with no mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    22 tools cover the essential browser automation lifecycle and interactive actions without being excessive; the count is well-scoped for the server's purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers core browsing workflows (navigation, tab management, element interaction, screenshots). Missing utilities like JavaScript execution, alert handling, or advanced element actions, but these are minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources