A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceWraps OpenAI's Codex CLI as an MCP server, enabling AI clients like KiloCode, Roo Code, and Cline to leverage Codex for code generation, debugging, and analysis through natural language.
52
MIT
codex-cli-mcp
by nayagamez
Related Servers
Alternatives to codex-cli-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLocal MCP bridge that lets Codex operate local Claude Code sessions, including listing, starting, resuming, forking, prompting, and stopping conversations via the Remote Control CLI.14MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceBridges MCP clients with local Codex CLI to execute autonomous coding tasks, manage threads, and inspect history via SQLite state.13577 npm4Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables ChatGPT and Claude to securely connect to existing Codex sessions across local and remote development hosts via a self-hosted MCP gateway.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceCodex Bridge MCP is a local MCP orchestration service for a stable Claude Code x Codex CLI development workflow.2-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that wraps Codex CLI as a subprocess, exposing code execution, web search, and structured output as Model Context Protocol tools.837 npm3MIT
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: codex starts a new conversation, while codex-reply continues an existing one using a thread ID. There is no ambiguity between them, as each accepts different inputs and performs a different action.
Naming Consistency4/5
Both tool names share the 'codex' prefix, but 'codex' is a standalone verb while 'codex-reply' is a compound with a hyphen. This is a minor inconsistency, but the pattern is predictable and readable, clearly indicating the primary action and the continuation action.
Tool Count3/5
With only 2 tools, the set is on the low end of the range, but it is appropriate for the narrow scope of running Codex CLI sessions. The tools cover the essential start and continue operations, though the set feels thin compared to more comprehensive servers.
Completeness4/5
The core lifecycle of starting and continuing a conversation is covered, which covers the main use case. However, there are no tools for listing active threads, ending sessions, or retrieving session history, which are minor gaps given the focus on interactive coding tasks.
Maintenance
ActivityStale
ResponsivenessNo issues