Get Page details

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations declare readOnlyHint=true, and the description is consistent with a read-only operation, so there is no contradiction. The description adds useful detail about the returned fields but does not discuss authentication, rate limits, or default-page behavior; with read-only annotations, this is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that succinctly lists the key output fields without filler. It is appropriately sized for a simple tool and every word contributes value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a low-complexity, one-parameter, read-only tool with no output schema, the description is sufficiently complete: it enumerates the returned profile fields, and the schema covers parameter semantics. Nothing essential is missing for an agent to select and invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema fully documents the single optional page parameter, including how to specify it by name or id and that omitting it uses the default. Since schema description coverage is 100%, the tool description adds no additional parameter-level meaning, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the resource (a Page) and the operation (retrieve profile details), and lists specific fields so an agent knows what information is returned. It does not explicitly distinguish itself from sibling tools like list_pages or get_page_insights, though 'profile details' strongly implies a single-page read.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description conveys an implied use case: retrieve profile details for a specific Page. However, it offers no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance and does not mention alternatives such as list_pages for enumeration or get_page_insights for analytics.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.