Skip to main content
Glama
navid-kianfar

Claude Memory MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to Claude Memory MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Persistent, searchable project memory for Claude Code. Each project has its own local DuckDB with vector embeddings, auto-loading context at session start.
      24
      33
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides persistent, searchable memory for Claude Code using local SQLite, semantic embeddings, and full-text search, enabling Claude to recall and retrieve context across sessions and projects without external services.
      8 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides local-first, cross-session memory for Claude Code, enabling semantic search across past sessions to retrieve procedures, decisions, or answers without exposing secrets.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Persistent memory + FTS5 full-text search for Claude Code conversation history. Indexes ~/.claude/projects/ JSONL into SQLite, exposes 10 MCP tools (store/recall/search memories, browse sessions, get summaries) plus prompts. Includes a web UI for visual exploration
      10
      42 npm
      93
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a local long-term memory layer for AI coding tools like Cursor and Claude Code, enabling cross-session, cross-tool sharing of project facts, user preferences, decisions, and workflows.
      12 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct and clear purpose, with names like memory_store, memory_search, memory_add_rule, and memory_session_start all targeting different operations. While there are many tools, descriptions ensure they are easily distinguished, and there is no ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'memory_<verb>_<noun>' pattern (e.g., memory_list_projects, memory_init_project, memory_add_rule, memory_session_end). No mixing of conventions, making it predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count4/5

    37 tools is higher than typical but justified by the broad scope: project management, memory CRUD, rules, templates, sessions, import/export, and model configuration. A slight reduction could improve simplicity, but it remains well-scoped for the domain.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full lifecycle of memory management: create/read/update/delete for memories, projects, and rules, plus sessions, templates, import/export, and version checking. No obvious gaps for the intended purpose of a persistent memory server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues