F
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to generate, score, run, and auto-heal Playwright E2E tests while enforcing domain-driven page object architecture and anti-flakiness rules.
-
LocatorLabs MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to LocatorLabs MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to execute browser automation, perform QA tasks, and generate test code through natural language commands using Playwright.5-
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to inspect, debug, and test web pages using Playwright. Provides comprehensive DOM inspection, visibility debugging, layout validation, and element finding capabilities in real browser environments.34584MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAutomates repository analysis, test planning, and generation of end-to-end tests with Playwright, acting as an intelligent quality assistant.16MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to create, run, autocorrect, and monitor Playwright tests for your app with a local dashboard, credential vault, and public status page.16MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI-powered web test automation with self-healing locators and automatic GitHub checkin.-
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 5 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a distinct, non-overlapping purpose: analyze_page for page-wide element analysis, generate_page_object for POM generation, generate_test for test script creation, get_locators for element-specific locator retrieval, and run_test for test execution. The descriptions clearly differentiate their scopes (e.g., get_locators is for specific elements vs. analyze_page for entire pages), eliminating ambiguity.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (e.g., analyze_page, generate_page_object, run_test). The verbs are action-oriented and descriptive (analyze, generate, get, run), creating a predictable and readable naming convention throughout the set.
Tool Count5/5
With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of web automation and testing support. Each tool serves a unique function in the workflow (analysis, POM generation, test creation, locator retrieval, test execution), and none feel redundant or missing, making the count appropriate for the domain.
Completeness4/5
The toolset covers core web automation workflows comprehensively: analysis, POM generation, test creation, locator retrieval, and test execution. A minor gap exists in lacking direct element interaction tools (e.g., click_element or fill_form), but agents can work around this by using generated tests or locators, and the overall surface supports end-to-end testing tasks effectively.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues