Skip to main content
Glama
naubergois

FileAgent

by naubergois
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to FileAgent

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • sftp-mcp

      cordfuse
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a browsable, mutable SFTP filesystem for AI agents, supporting file operations like listing, uploading, downloading, moving, and deleting.
      MIT

    • pulr

      taleilon
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Secure file exchange MCP server enabling AI agents to upload, share, fetch, and revoke files with SHA-256 verification, malware scanning, expiry, access restrictions, and human approval workflows.
      13
      MIT

    • mcp-file-manager

      AMEOBIUS-space
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents file system access: read, write, search, hash, directory trees — 12 tools, zero dependencies, pure Python stdlib.
      MIT

    • mcp-virtual-fs

      lu-zhengda
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides AI agents with a persistent, PostgreSQL-backed virtual filesystem, supporting session-isolated file operations, cross-session shared stores, and glob/grep search.
      11
      37
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 31 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tools have overlapping functionality, making it unclear which to use. For example, ftp_put and doc_put both store content and return a SHA-256 hash, ftp_get and doc_get both retrieve content by hash, and ftp_stat and ftp_meta both retrieve metadata. This redundancy increases the risk of misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming mostly follows a consistent pattern of prefix (ftp_ or doc_) plus a verb (put, get, ls, stat, etc.), with only a few exceptions like ftp_hashes and ftp_register. Overall, the naming is predictable and semantically aligned with the action.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 31 tools, the server is on the higher end but not excessive. However, the count is inflated by redundant operations (e.g., ftp_stat vs. ftp_meta, ftp_ls vs. doc_list) and a clear split between file management and document management, which could be streamlined without loss of functionality.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers CRUD for files and documents, versioning, locking, sharing, and admin functions. However, there is no explicit document deletion tool (doc_delete), and the distinction between immutable blobs and editable documents is not fully addressed (e.g., doc_update exists but no corresponding ftp_update). This leaves minor gaps in lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources