run_all_seeds

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only states that seeds are run sequentially but gives no details about behavioral traits such as idempotency, potential side effects (e.g., data deletion), or whether the tool requires specific permissions. With no annotations, the description carries the full burden and falls short.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, consisting of a single sentence that conveys the essential information. While it is not elaborate, it is appropriately sized for the tool's simplicity. It could be front-loaded with more context, but the brevity is not wasteful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no parameters and no output schema, the description is minimal. However, it lacks context about when to use this combined approach, any prerequisites, and what the output or return value is. For a tool that combines two operations, more completeness is expected.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters and 100% schema coverage. The description is not required to add parameter information since there are none. A baseline score of 4 is appropriate as no additional meaning is needed beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool runs base seed then data seed in order. It specifies the verb 'runs' and the resources 'base seed' and 'data seed'. It implicitly differentiates from the individual seed tools by combining them, though it does not explicitly mention that it is a composite operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus running run_base_seed and run_data_seed separately. There is no mention of prerequisites, order dependencies, or any context that would help an agent decide to use this combined tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.