herdr_pane_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavior. It simply says 'Get details' without stating whether this is a read-only operation, what the response format is, or any error conditions. While 'get' implies non-mutation, it does not provide meaningful behavioral transparency beyond the operation name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, compact sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and easy to parse. However, it is under-specified, so while it is concise, it sacrifices clarity for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that this is a simple getter with one parameter and no output schema, the description should at least explain what 'details' means and how to use pane_id. It does neither. It also lacks any differentiation from sibling tools, making it incomplete for an agent to confidently select and invoke this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides only a required string pane_id with no description. The description says 'for a pane', which minimally suggests pane_id identifies the pane, but it does not explain how to obtain a valid ID, what format it should be in, or any additional semantics. With 0% schema description coverage, the description should compensate more substantially.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get details for a pane' provides a verb and resource, but 'details' is vague and does not specify what details are included. It also does not distinguish from sibling tools like herdr_pane_read, which could also be interpreted as retrieving pane information. The purpose is somewhat unclear without additional context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as herdr_pane_list or herdr_pane_read. There is no mention of context, preconditions, or exclusions. An agent is left to infer usage from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.