Skip to main content
Glama
nathanfolkman

CUF Health Portal MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to CUF Health Portal MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes the Joaquim Chaves Saúde patient portal as MCP tools, letting Claude or other clients fetch appointments, prescriptions, invoices, and documents from webapp.jcs.pt.
      11
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to securely read a user's own sundhed.dk health record data, including medications, lab results, vaccinations, and referrals, after MitID login via a local browser session.
      12
      330 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides integration with the Cliniko API for healthcare practice management, enabling patient, appointment, invoice, and payment operations via natural language.
      27
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools map cleanly to distinct resource/action pairs, and the list_/get_ pairing makes common document and invoice workflows obvious. However, list_appointments and list_past_appointments clearly overlap for recent past appointments, and list_exam_results vs list_clinical_documents have some potential boundary ambiguity around lab/pathology results. The descriptions help, but a couple of tools could still be confused.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_ for collections, get_ for individual items or PDF downloads, and parse_ for prescription extraction. This makes the tool set highly predictable and easy for an agent to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is well-scoped for a health portal covering clinical documents, invoices, appointments, exam results, prescriptions, notifications, and patient info. Each tool has a clear purpose, and none feel redundant or superfluous.

    Completeness3/5

    Read-only retrieval is well covered: every listed resource has at least a list/get or download path, and prescription parsing adds useful post-processing. However, appointment fields like canCancel and canReSchedule indicate self-service actions that are not exposed, and there are no cancel/reschedule or update workflow tools. This creates notable dead ends for tasks beyond viewing or downloading.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues