Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Joomla MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An embeddable library and self-hosted MCP server for administering Joomla 6.x through bounded, auditable semantic actions via the Joomla Web Services API or a native companion plugin.
      3 npm
      4
      GPL 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A universal connector hub that proxies Claude.ai tool calls to any CMS that runs an MCP server, enabling natural language interactions with Drupal, Joomla, WordPress, and more through a single endpoint.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for WordPress content management via REST API, supporting posts, pages, media, comments, and terms through natural language interfaces like Cursor, ChatGPT, Codex, and Claude.
      17 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for WordPress content management that provides a secure interface for AI assistants to interact with WordPress sites, enabling content creation, editing, and media management without destructive operations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for WordPress automation that enables users to manage content, themes, and site configurations using AI-driven workflows and the WordPress REST API. It provides a wide array of tools for site planning, management, and optimization compatible with tools like Cursor and Claude.
      60 npm
      1
      ISC

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between 'manage_article_state' and 'move_article_to_trash' since moving to trash is a specific state change. The descriptions clarify this, but an agent might initially confuse them as both handle article states. Other tools like create, get, and update are clearly differentiated.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming is mixed: some tools use verb_noun (e.g., create_article, update_article), while others include 'joomla' prefix (e.g., get_joomla_articles, get_joomla_categories) and one uses a different verb style (manage_article_state). This inconsistency reduces predictability, though the names remain readable and understandable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the count is well-scoped for managing articles and categories in a Joomla context. Each tool serves a specific function, and there are no extraneous tools, making it appropriate for the server's purpose without being overwhelming or insufficient.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers core CRUD operations for articles (create, get, update, delete via trash) and includes category retrieval, which is essential for Joomla content management. A minor gap exists in lacking direct category management tools (e.g., create or update categories), but agents can still perform basic workflows with the provided tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues