list_gazettes

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses return type (JSON string) and error handling (Chinese error messages) but does not mention read-only nature, data sources, or rate limits. Lacks detail beyond basic behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with Args, Returns, Raises sections. It is concise, contains no redundancy, and every sentence adds value. The Chinese text is appropriate for the tool's locale.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 5 parameters (0 required) and an output schema, the description covers all parameters, return format, and error handling. It could mention pagination behavior or ordering, but overall it is sufficiently complete for a listing tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the description largely repeats schema info with added examples (e.g., '1137701' for gazette_id). This adds modest value beyond the schema, earning the baseline score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists gazettes, matching the name. Among siblings, 'get_gazette' likely retrieves a single gazette, but the description does not explicitly differentiate; however, the verb 'list' and parameters imply bulk listing with filters.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The docstring provides parameter example values and constraints (e.g., limit ≤100), implying usage context. However, there is no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus sibling alternatives like 'get_gazette' or 'list_gazette_agendas'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.