Skip to main content
Glama
narmaku

Linux MCP Server

by narmaku

Related Servers

Alternatives to Linux MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables read-only Linux system diagnostics and troubleshooting on local and remote RHEL-based systems via SSH, including services, processes, logs, network, and storage analysis.
      20
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for read-only Linux system administration and diagnostics on RHEL-based systems via SSH. It enables users to troubleshoot remote hosts by accessing system information, services, logs, and network configurations through natural language.
      19
      544 PyPI
      295
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to diagnose Linux server incidents by collecting and structuring system diagnostics from multiple servers via SSH, with tools for finding incident clusters, gathering context (memory, CPU, swap, etc.), and running arbitrary commands.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only observability of a Linux host via MCP, exposing allowlisted systemd, docker, nginx, logs, disk, and cert info without shell access.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables managing Linux servers via SSH with tools for command execution, file operations, service management, and log analysis.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes targeting specific Linux system components (CPU, memory, network, processes, services, logs, filesystems). However, there is some overlap between get_audit_logs, get_journal_logs, get_service_logs, and read_log_file which could cause confusion about which log retrieval tool to use in different scenarios.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern with snake_case throughout. The pattern is either 'get_[resource]' or 'list_[resource]' with clear, descriptive names that immediately indicate what each tool does.

    Tool Count4/5

    20 tools is slightly high but reasonable for a comprehensive Linux system monitoring server. The tools cover multiple system domains (hardware, processes, services, networking, storage, logs), and each appears to serve a specific purpose within this broad scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset provides excellent read-only coverage of Linux system monitoring with tools for hardware, processes, services, networking, storage, and logs. Minor gaps exist in write/control operations (no service start/stop, process management, or configuration modification tools), but for a monitoring-focused server, the coverage is quite comprehensive.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues