Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
nano-step

embrace-raw-readonly

by nano-step
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to embrace-raw-readonly

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • EasyShiftPlan MCP Bridge

      ray999
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP hosts that require a local stdio process to connect to the hosted public demo, forwarding tool discovery and calls for fictional scheduling scenarios, product information, draft-sharing preparation, and optional feedback.
      MIT

    • Langfuse MCP Server

      Jaehyunr9433
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor to debug failing traces, sessions, and exceptions, inspect route decisions, prompts, datasets, and metrics, and control token overhead via compact output, file dumps, and selective tool loading. It supports local stdio or HTTP deployment with optional read-only mode for safer observability workflows.
      -

    • lmstudio-mcp

      Ka1y0
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables diagnosing, testing, benchmarking, and deliberately controlling LM Studio through a local-only MCP stdio server, with mutations disabled by default and evidence-based capability verification.
      18
      MIT

    • agent-hub

      raylison100
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Desktop or Claude Code to drive the local daemon through stdio, listing agents and sessions, running agents, and reporting costs.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one lists available tools, the other invokes a specific tool. There is no overlap or ambiguity in selecting between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tools start with 'embrace_' and include 'readonly', but one is 'list_readonly_tools' (verb_noun) while the other is 'call_readonly' (verb_adjective). The pattern is mostly consistent but not perfectly parallel.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, the surface is thin. However, this is a deliberate thin proxy layer for a remote readonly API, so the minimalism is justified, but it still falls below the typical well-scoped range.

    Completeness5/5

    The two tools form a complete interface for interacting with the remote readonly toolset: listing available schemas and calling them. There are no missing operations within the stated scope of acting as a proxy.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources