Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Earch MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables web and local search capabilities using the Brave Search API, allowing users to perform general web searches and find local businesses with ratings, hours, and contact info.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables web and local business searches through the Brave Search API. Provides general web search with pagination and filtering, plus local business search with automatic fallback to web results.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables web searching and local business discovery through the Brave Search API. Provides both general web search with pagination and filtering controls, plus local business search with automatic fallback to web results.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Integrates the Brave Search API to provide web and local search capabilities, including news, articles, and business information. It features smart fallbacks from local to web search and supports pagination and freshness controls.
      102
      1
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Integrates the Brave Search API to provide comprehensive web and local search capabilities. It enables users to perform general web queries, search for news, and find local business information with smart fallback functionality.
      13,250
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides web and local search capabilities via the Brave Search API, with pagination, freshness controls, and automatic fallback from local to web search.
      -

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools are mostly distinct in purpose, with clear separation between local search (descriptions vs. POIs) and web search (rich vs. standard). However, the distinction between 'local.descriptions' and 'local.pois' could be slightly ambiguous without more context about what each returns, as both handle location IDs.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Naming is mostly consistent with a clear prefix pattern (local. vs. web.) and descriptive suffixes. Minor deviations exist, such as 'web.rich' being less conventional than 'web.search', but overall the naming is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, the count is well-scoped for a search-focused server. Each tool appears to serve a specific function without redundancy, making the set manageable and appropriate for the domain of search operations.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers basic search functionalities (local and web), but there are notable gaps. For example, there is no tool for updating or deleting search data, and advanced features like filtering or sorting are missing, which could limit agent workflows in a comprehensive search domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues