Earch MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Earch MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables web and local search capabilities using the Brave Search API, allowing users to perform general web searches and find local businesses with ratings, hours, and contact info.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables web and local business searches through the Brave Search API. Provides general web search with pagination and filtering, plus local business search with automatic fallback to web results.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables web searching and local business discovery through the Brave Search API. Provides both general web search with pagination and filtering controls, plus local business search with automatic fallback to web results.2-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceIntegrates the Brave Search API to provide web and local search capabilities, including news, articles, and business information. It features smart fallbacks from local to web search and supports pagination and freshness controls.1021GPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceIntegrates the Brave Search API to provide comprehensive web and local search capabilities. It enables users to perform general web queries, search for news, and find local business information with smart fallback functionality.13,250MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides web and local search capabilities via the Brave Search API, with pagination, freshness controls, and automatic fallback from local to web search.-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The tools are mostly distinct in purpose, with clear separation between local search (descriptions vs. POIs) and web search (rich vs. standard). However, the distinction between 'local.descriptions' and 'local.pois' could be slightly ambiguous without more context about what each returns, as both handle location IDs.
Naming is mostly consistent with a clear prefix pattern (local. vs. web.) and descriptive suffixes. Minor deviations exist, such as 'web.rich' being less conventional than 'web.search', but overall the naming is predictable and readable.
With 4 tools, the count is well-scoped for a search-focused server. Each tool appears to serve a specific function without redundancy, making the set manageable and appropriate for the domain of search operations.
The toolset covers basic search functionalities (local and web), but there are notable gaps. For example, there is no tool for updating or deleting search data, and advanced features like filtering or sorting are missing, which could limit agent workflows in a comprehensive search domain.