get_ticket
Retrieve full details of a Jira ticket by its issue key. Includes all fields and metadata.
Instructions
Get full details of a Jira ticket by its key
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticket_id | Yes | Jira issue key, e.g. GEM-234 |
Retrieve full details of a Jira ticket by its issue key. Includes all fields and metadata.
Get full details of a Jira ticket by its key
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticket_id | Yes | Jira issue key, e.g. GEM-234 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must carry behavioral disclosure. Only states 'Get full details' without mentioning auth, rate limits, error behavior, or what 'full' entails.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, 10 words, efficient and front-loaded. Could be more structured but achieves clarity with minimal verbosity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple one-param tool, description covers core function and input. Lacks output description or error info, but functional given low complexity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameters with description for ticket_id, so description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb (Get), resource (full details of a Jira ticket), and method (by its key), distinguishing it from siblings like search_tickets.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implicitly guides use by specifying 'by its key', implying it is for known keys and not for searching, but lacks explicit exclusions or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/namcpgem/gem-jira-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server