Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to nagi-ledger

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides structured audit logging for AI agent repair tasks via tools to start, record, end, query, and export event traces, with JSONL persistence and SDK integration.
      5
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables AI agents to manage artifacts across sessions by providing tools for searching, retrieving, and registering entries in a persistent ledger, ensuring consistency and traceability of agent outputs.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that exposes local coding-agent session logs as three tools for introspection of recent work, debugging tool failures, and tracking token usage and estimated cost without parsing log files.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server providing an append-only, hash-chained evidence ledger for agent actions, where every record is a tamper-evident receipt cryptographically bound to all prior records and persisted as human-readable JSONL local state. It exposes tools to append records, verify chain integrity (pinpointing tampering), query records by actor/action/target/time, and fetch ledger stats—with no update or delete capabilities by design.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Tamper-evident audit logging for AI agents. Append-only, hash-chained, optionally Ed25519-signed log. The MCP server lets an agent keep and verify a record of what it actually did.
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct domain object: general actions, subagent dispatches, verdicts, task status, and approaches. No two tools perform the same function, and the descriptions make the boundaries clear, even where overlap might occur (e.g., log_action vs log_approach).

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The consistent 'ledger_' prefix is good, but the suffix pattern is mixed: some tools use verb_noun (log_action, log_dispatch, log_verdict, log_approach, check_approaches) while others use noun_noun (task_status, session_report) or a bare noun (stats). This inconsistency makes the set slightly less predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well within the ideal range for a specialized audit ledger. The set includes both write and query operations without unnecessary redundancy or bloat, and each tool earns its place.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface provides comprehensive coverage for the domain: writing actions, dispatches, verdicts, and approaches, plus reading and aggregating that data. There are no obvious gaps; the append-only nature of the ledger is appropriate and fully supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues