Aliyun MCP Server
Aliyun MCP サーバー
この MCP サーバーは、Claude を通じて Aliyun (Alibaba Cloud) サービスと対話するためのツールを提供します。
特徴
SLS(シンプルログサービス)ログを照会する
(将来)ECSインスタンスの管理
(将来)サーバーレス関数のデプロイ
Related MCP server: CLS MCP Server
構成
サーバーを構築します。
npm install
npm run buildClaude Desktopでの使用
claude_desktop_config.json にサーバーを追加します。
{
"mcpServers": {
"aliyun": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/path/to/aliyun-mcp-server/build/index.js"],
"env": {
"ALIYUN_ACCESS_KEY_ID": "your-access-key-id",
"ALIYUN_ACCESS_KEY_SECRET": "your-access-key-secret",
"SLS_ENDPOINT": "cn-hangzhou.log.aliyuncs.com"
},
"disabled": false,
"autoApprove": []
}
}
}Cline の構成
VSCode の設定cline_mcp_settings.json内の Cline MCP 設定ファイルにサーバーを追加します。
{
"mcpServers": {
"aliyun": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/path/to/aliyun-mcp-server/build/index.js"],
"env": {
"ALIYUN_ACCESS_KEY_ID": "your-access-key-id",
"ALIYUN_ACCESS_KEY_SECRET": "your-access-key-secret",
"SLS_ENDPOINT": "cn-hangzhou.log.aliyuncs.com"
},
"disabled": false,
"autoApprove": []
}
}
}/path/to/aliyun-mcp-serverこのリポジトリへの実際のパスに置き換え、Aliyun の資格情報を入力します。
使用法
設定が完了したら、Claude に SLS ログを照会するよう依頼できます。
Query SLS logs from project "my-project" and logstore "my-logstore" with the query "error" for the last hour.Claude は MCP サーバーを使用してクエリを実行し、結果を返します。
利用可能なツール
クエリSLSLogs
Aliyun SLS (Simple Log Service) ログを照会します。
パラメータ:
project(必須): SLS プロジェクト名logstore(必須): SLS ログストア名query(必須): SLSクエリステートメントfrom(オプション):開始時刻(ミリ秒単位)(デフォルトは1時間前)to(オプション): 終了時刻(ミリ秒単位)(デフォルトは現在)limit(オプション): 返されるログの最大数 (デフォルト: 100、最大: 1000)offset(オプション):ページ区切りのオフセット(デフォルト:0)reverse(オプション):結果を逆順に返すかどうか(デフォルト:false)
例:
{
"project": "my-project",
"logstore": "my-logstore",
"query": "error",
"limit": 10
}Available Tools
1 toolquerySLSLogsC
Query Aliyun SLS (Simple Log Service) logs
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| from | No | Start time in milliseconds (defaults to 1 hour ago) | |
| limit | No | Maximum number of logs to return (default: 100, max: 1000) | |
| logstore | Yes | SLS logstore name | |
| offset | No | Offset for pagination (default: 0) | |
| project | Yes | SLS project name | |
| query | Yes | SLS query statement | |
| reverse | No | Whether to return results in reverse order (default: false) | |
| to | No | End time in milliseconds (defaults to now) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions querying logs but fails to describe key behaviors such as authentication requirements, rate limits, error handling, or the format of returned results, leaving significant gaps for an agent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, direct sentence with no wasted words, making it highly concise and front-loaded. It efficiently communicates the core function without unnecessary elaboration.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity of an 8-parameter log querying tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It lacks details on behavior, results format, and usage context, making it incomplete for effective agent operation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% description coverage, clearly documenting all 8 parameters with defaults and constraints. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond the schema, so it meets the baseline for adequate but not enhanced coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'query' and the resource 'Aliyun SLS (Simple Log Service) logs', making the purpose specific and understandable. However, with no sibling tools mentioned, it lacks explicit differentiation from potential alternatives, though this is not a fault given the context.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or context for its application. It merely states what it does without indicating scenarios or constraints for usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
v1.0.0- First observed
querySLSLogs
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined as querying Aliyun SLS logs, making it distinct by default.
Since there is only one tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The tool name 'querySLSLogs' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, and there are no other tools to compare it against for inconsistency.
A single tool is too few for a server named 'Aliyun MCP Server', which implies broader cloud service functionality. This minimal toolset severely limits the server's scope and utility, making it feel incomplete and underpowered for its apparent purpose.
The server appears to target Aliyun cloud services, but with only a log querying tool, there are significant gaps in coverage. Missing are core operations like managing resources (e.g., creating/deleting instances), monitoring, or other SLS functions beyond querying, making the surface severely incomplete.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Ingest and search LogsLoom logs from coding agents.
Deploy, monitor, and manage your OpenClaw AI assistants via natural language.
GA4, Google Ads and Search Console in Claude. Read-only OAuth, multi-account for agencies.
Create projects, nodes, and tasks in UluP Spaces by conversation with Claude.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query and analyze Alibaba Cloud SLS logs using natural language, supporting multiple log sources like Function Compute and ECS. It provides tools for searching logs, performing SQL analysis, and visualizing log distributions directly within Cursor or Claude.643 npm11MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides a suite of 33 tools for interacting with Tencent Cloud Log Service (CLS), enabling log analysis, PromQL metrics queries, and resource management. It allows AI assistants to perform CQL/SQL retrieval, manage alarm strategies, and handle data processing tasks with tiered permission controls.246Apache 2.0
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables log analysis, searching, counting, and system metrics retrieval (CPU, memory, disk) via natural language, using 5 tools that can be integrated with Claude Code.5-

Tencent Cloud Log Serviceofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables large language models to directly access Tencent Cloud Log Service for log search, metric queries, and alarm management without code.271 npm14Apache 2.0