A
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceEnables AI assistants to control Anytype objects, blocks, and views via its internal gRPC API.
MIT
Anytype MCP Server
by nahuweb
Related Servers
Alternatives to Anytype MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Anytype data through the local API, allowing search, creation, modification, and export of objects, spaces, and lists.1824-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to list, read, search, create, update, rename, and delete markdown notes in a local Obsidian vault via an HTTP MCP endpoint.8MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables hybrid search, reading, writing, and managing a local Obsidian vault through MCP tools and a REST API, including section patching, appending, moving notes with link rewriting, and frontmatter updates.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables search, content creation, weblink saving, and knowledge base analysis with Capacities through any MCP-compatible client.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables programmatic control of Obsidian vaults via REST API and MCP server for automation and AI assistant integration.16MIT
TDQS
B3.1/5.0
Scored across 33 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting specific resources (objects, spaces, properties, tags, types, collections, members, templates) and actions (create, get, list, update, delete, add/remove, search). No ambiguity exists between tools like anytype_get_object vs anytype_list_objects or anytype_create_property vs anytype_update_property. The descriptions reinforce distinct operations.
Naming Consistency5/5
All 33 tools follow a perfect verb_noun pattern with the prefix 'anytype_' and snake_case throughout. The pattern is consistent: anytype_[action]_[resource] (e.g., anytype_create_object, anytype_get_space, anytype_list_tags). No deviations in style or convention exist across the toolset.
Tool Count4/5
With 33 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for a comprehensive content management system covering spaces, objects, properties, types, tags, templates, members, and collections. Each tool appears to serve a specific purpose in the domain, though some consolidation might be possible (e.g., add/remove from collection could be one tool).
Completeness5/5
The toolset provides complete CRUD/lifecycle coverage for all core domain entities: spaces, objects, properties, types, tags, templates, and members. It includes create, get, list, update, and delete operations for each, plus search, collection management, and view handling. No obvious gaps exist; agents can perform full workflows without dead ends.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive