Skip to main content
Glama
naft3r-101

Testing Platform — MCP server

by naft3r-101

update_issue

Update an existing issue by patching its fields: change status, priority, title, description, or type. Automatically move cards through triage columns without extra confirmation.

Instructions

Patch fields on an existing issue. Use to change status (move it across columns), reprioritize, retitle, etc.

STATUS CHANGES: moving a card to in_progress (you're picking it up to work on) or in_review (it's ready for the reporter to verify) is part of the normal triage flow. Just do it when it's warranted; you do not need to ask the user for confirmation first. The same goes for moving a stalled card back to new.

When NOT to move silently: terminal states. Moving an in_review card to done / wont_fix is blocked server-side unless the reporter has signed off (this is intentional). For human reporters, post a comment asking them to confirm. For service-account reporters (e.g. yourself), use a non-terminal status or ask the developer.

AUDIENCE: when editing title or description, the same plain-language rules from create_issue apply (non-developer testers read these too). Don't rewrite a reporter-friendly title into a developer-friendly one.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
urlNo
typeNo
titleNo
statusNo
priorityNo
descriptionNo
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations, so description bears full burden. Discloses that moving to done/wont_fix is blocked unless reporter signed off. Also mentions behavior for service-account reporters. Lacks details on authorization or rate limits, but status change behavior is well covered.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is multi-paragraph but front-loaded with main purpose. Uses clear section headings for status changes and audience. Every sentence serves a purpose, though could be slightly more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers status transition behavior and title/description guidelines thoroughly, with 7 parameters and no output schema. Missing error conditions and full parameter details, but sufficient for common use cases.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%. Description adds meaning for status (explains transition rules) and title/description (plain-language rules), but does not detail id, url, type, or priority. Some parameters like priority are left undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description starts with 'Patch fields on an existing issue.' and lists specific examples like status change, reprioritize, retitle. Clearly different from sibling tools like create_issue (create new) and get_issue (read).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit when to move card silently (in_progress, in_review, stalled->new) and when not to (terminal states blocked server-side). Also provides audience guidelines for title/description edits. Differentiates from add_comment for confirmation scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/naft3r-101/testing-platform-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server