Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to tooltrim

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server and local proxy that compresses LLM prompts, tool output, and replies to cut token cost, with a quality gate that reverts any step that does not save. Exposes llmtrim_compress, llmtrim_compress_text, and llmtrim_stats.
      3
      235
      Mozilla Public 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A transparent proxy that sits in front of any other MCP server and shrinks its tool output before it reaches the model. Lossless by default: the transformed bytes are a denser encoding of the same data, with a round-trip gate asserting an exact inverse over the corpus, so nothing is dropped, summarised, or offloaded to a cache that expires. Repeated calls to the same tool emit a delta against the
      2
      1,570 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP proxy that compresses tool schemas on the fly. Up to 98% token reduction, 100% signal preserved verified after every compression. Zero LLM calls, fully deterministic.
      5
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An adaptive tiny-model layer that sits between an LLM and its MCP tools, compressing verbose tool outputs to reduce token usage by up to two orders of magnitude.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Aggregator MCP proxy that collapses N downstream MCP servers into 4 meta-tools with progressive tool discovery, and compresses large tool outputs (HTML→Markdown, JSON summarization) with full-output retrieval via read_more and a per-session token-savings report.
      4
      61 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Compress and expand_tool_output have clearly opposite purposes: one reduces output, the other restores it. No overlap or ambiguity exists between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both names use imperative verbs, but 'compress' lacks the object that 'expand_tool_output' includes. Minor style deviation, but the pattern is still predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Two tools is exactly the right scope for a compression/expansion utility. Each tool serves a distinct, necessary role, and the pair is well-scoped.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full lifecycle: compress output and expand it back via reference. No critical missing operations for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive