n2n-memory
n2n-memory is a project-local knowledge graph MCP server that lets AI coding agents store, retrieve, and manage durable project knowledge and task context — all isolated per repository in .mcp/ files.
Graph Writes
n2n_add_entities– Add named entities (e.g., classes, functions, modules) with types and observations.n2n_add_observations– Append new facts to existing entities.n2n_create_relations– Link entities with typed relationships (e.g., CALLS, EXTENDS, USES).
Graph Reads
n2n_read_graph– Read the full knowledge graph with optional pagination and summary mode.n2n_get_graph_summary– Retrieve a lightweight summary (entity names and types) to save tokens.n2n_search– Search across entities, types, and observations with optional fuzzy matching and relevance scoring.n2n_open_nodes– Fetch full details for specific named entities.
Context Management
n2n_update_context– Track active task state including status (IN_PROGRESS, COMPLETED, BLOCKED, PLANNING), next steps, last Git commit, and reasons — saved tocontext.jsonfor session handoffs.
Maintenance & Export
n2n_delete_entities/n2n_delete_observations/n2n_delete_relations– Remove entities, specific observations, or relations from the graph.n2n_export_markdown– Export the entire knowledge graph to a Markdown file (default:KNOWLEDGE_GRAPH.md) in the project root.
Project Isolation & Initialization
All tools require an absolute
projectPath, scoping memory per repository.New projects require a confirmation handshake (
confirmNewProjectRoot) before.mcp/storage is created, preventing accidental initialization outside valid project roots (identified by markers like.gitorpackage.json).
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@n2n-memoryAdd entity 'Login Flow' and connect it to 'Auth Module'"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
n2n-memory
Project-local knowledge-graph memory MCP server from N2NS Lab for AI coding agents.
Context as code. Memory as asset.
n2n-memory is an open-source, local-first Model Context Protocol (MCP) memory server for AI coding assistants. It prevents cross-project memory pollution by storing durable project knowledge in .mcp/memory.json and active task context in .mcp/context.json inside each repository.
📚 Contents
Related MCP server: Memento
💡 What is n2n-memory?
n2n-memory gives AI coding tools a project-local knowledge graph they can read and update through MCP. Memory and context are stored inside each repository under .mcp/, keeping them isolated, Git-friendly, and reviewable.
Restore project context at the start of an AI coding session.
Preserve architecture decisions, implementation notes, and known pitfalls.
Share durable project memory with teammates through Git.
Keep memory isolated per repository when working across many projects.
🚀 Quick start
1. Configure your MCP client
Claude Desktop
File Path: %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"n2n-memory": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "n2n-memory"]
}
}
}Cursor / VS Code
Add in the MCP settings panel:
Name:
n2n-memoryType:
commandCommand:
npx -y n2n-memory
Other MCP clients
The server uses stdio MCP and can be wired to any MCP client that supports local command execution.
If your client supports it, set
N2N_LOG_LEVEL=debugonly when troubleshooting local path resolution.
2. Usage guide
This service is path-driven. AI assistants should pay attention to:
Absolute Project Root: When calling any
n2n_*tool, provide the absolute path of the current project root or workspace top-level directory (projectPath).Initialization Handshake: The first call in a project that has no
.mcp/yet does not create anything. The server detects the project root and replies withstatus: "AWAITING_CONFIRMATION"and adetectedRoot. Call the same tool again withconfirmNewProjectRootset to that exactdetectedRootto initialize memory. Folders without a real project marker (.git,package.json, language build files, …) are rejected outright, so memory is never created in an arbitrary directory.Auto Storage: Durable memory is saved to
[ProjectPath]/.mcp/memory.json; active task context is saved to[ProjectPath]/.mcp/context.json.Collaboration: Commit
.mcp/memory.jsonwhen the knowledge graph should be shared with the team. Commitcontext.jsononly if your workflow wants active task state shared.
Storage layout inside each project:
<project-root>/
└── .mcp/
├── memory.json # durable knowledge graph — commit to share with the team
└── context.json # active task context — usually kept localRecommended .gitignore policy for teams that want to share durable memory:
.mcp/context.json
!.mcp/
!.mcp/memory.jsonIf your project memory may contain private implementation details, keep the whole .mcp/ directory ignored.
Available tools
Graph writes (
n2n_add_entities,n2n_add_observations,n2n_create_relations): add entities, observations, and relations to build the knowledge graph.Graph reads (
n2n_read_graph,n2n_get_graph_summary,n2n_search,n2n_open_nodes): read the full graph, get a lightweight summary, search, or open specific entities.Context (
n2n_update_context): update active task state before commits and handoffs.Maintenance (
n2n_delete_entities,n2n_delete_observations,n2n_delete_relations,n2n_export_markdown): delete entities, observations, or relations; export the graph to Markdown.
See Tools reference for parameter schemas and usage notes.
⚙️ Configuration
n2n-memory runs as a stdio MCP server with no CLI subcommands — start it with npx -y n2n-memory (or n2n-memory once installed). Storage location is derived from the projectPath you pass to each tool, not from configuration.
Variable | Description | Default |
| Set to | unset |
🔐 Security and governance notes
n2n_delete_entities,n2n_delete_observations, andn2n_delete_relationsare destructive and should be governed by review workflows.Keep
context.jsonuncommitted by default, and commit.mcp/memory.jsononly when team sharing is intentional.Existing but unreadable JSON files are treated as data integrity errors, not as empty memory.
Export paths must be relative and must stay inside the project root.
Relations that point to missing entities are rejected.
Generic README-only folders are not treated as project roots; use a real project marker such as
.git,package.json, or language-specific build files.Full local paths are hidden from server logs by default. Set
N2N_LOG_LEVEL=debugwhen diagnosing path issues.See SECURITY.md for vulnerability reporting.
📖 Related docs
Design: Why project-level isolation?
Tools reference: MCP tool parameter schemas and usage notes.
Development: How to build, test and extend.
Roadmap: Planned features and what's coming next.
Changelog: Version history and incident recovery.
Contributing: How to report issues and contribute.
Security: How to report vulnerabilities.
📄 License
This project is licensed under the MIT License.
Built by N2NS Lab, the open-source lab of datafrog.io for practical AI developer tools.
Available Tools
12 toolsn2n_add_entitiesD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectPath | Yes | The absolute path to the project or any subdirectory within the project. | |
| confirmNewProjectRoot | No | MUST be provided ONLY when initializing a new project. Set this to the 'detectedRoot' path returned by the server's confirmation request. | |
| entities | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
n2n_add_observationsD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectPath | Yes | The absolute path to the project or any subdirectory within the project. | |
| confirmNewProjectRoot | No | MUST be provided ONLY when initializing a new project. Set this to the 'detectedRoot' path returned by the server's confirmation request. | |
| observations | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
n2n_create_relationsD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectPath | Yes | The absolute path to the project or any subdirectory within the project. | |
| confirmNewProjectRoot | No | MUST be provided ONLY when initializing a new project. Set this to the 'detectedRoot' path returned by the server's confirmation request. | |
| relations | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
n2n_delete_entitiesD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectPath | Yes | The absolute path to the project or any subdirectory within the project. | |
| confirmNewProjectRoot | No | MUST be provided ONLY when initializing a new project. Set this to the 'detectedRoot' path returned by the server's confirmation request. | |
| entityNames | Yes | Names of entities to delete |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
n2n_delete_observationsD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectPath | Yes | The absolute path to the project or any subdirectory within the project. | |
| confirmNewProjectRoot | No | MUST be provided ONLY when initializing a new project. Set this to the 'detectedRoot' path returned by the server's confirmation request. | |
| deletions | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
n2n_delete_relationsD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectPath | Yes | The absolute path to the project or any subdirectory within the project. | |
| confirmNewProjectRoot | No | MUST be provided ONLY when initializing a new project. Set this to the 'detectedRoot' path returned by the server's confirmation request. | |
| relations | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
n2n_export_markdownD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectPath | Yes | The absolute path to the project or any subdirectory within the project. | |
| confirmNewProjectRoot | No | MUST be provided ONLY when initializing a new project. Set this to the 'detectedRoot' path returned by the server's confirmation request. | |
| outputPath | No | Output file path relative to project root, defaults to KNOWLEDGE_GRAPH.md |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
n2n_get_graph_summaryD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectPath | Yes | The absolute path to the project or any subdirectory within the project. | |
| confirmNewProjectRoot | No | MUST be provided ONLY when initializing a new project. Set this to the 'detectedRoot' path returned by the server's confirmation request. | |
| limit | No | Maximum number of entities to return. | |
| offset | No | Number of entities to skip. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
n2n_open_nodesD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectPath | Yes | The absolute path to the project or any subdirectory within the project. | |
| confirmNewProjectRoot | No | MUST be provided ONLY when initializing a new project. Set this to the 'detectedRoot' path returned by the server's confirmation request. | |
| names | Yes | Names of entities to retrieve |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
n2n_read_graphD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectPath | Yes | The absolute path to the project or any subdirectory within the project. | |
| confirmNewProjectRoot | No | MUST be provided ONLY when initializing a new project. Set this to the 'detectedRoot' path returned by the server's confirmation request. | |
| summaryMode | No | If true, returns only entity names and types without detailed observations to save tokens. | |
| limit | No | Maximum number of entities to return. | |
| offset | No | Number of entities to skip. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
n2n_searchD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectPath | Yes | The absolute path to the project or any subdirectory within the project. | |
| confirmNewProjectRoot | No | MUST be provided ONLY when initializing a new project. Set this to the 'detectedRoot' path returned by the server's confirmation request. | |
| query | Yes | Search keywords for entities, types, or observations | |
| limit | No | Maximum number of entities to return. | |
| offset | No | Number of entities to skip. | |
| fuzzy | No | Enable fuzzy matching for typo tolerance and semantic similarity (default: true). | |
| minScore | No | Minimum relevance score threshold 0-1 (default: 0.3). Higher values return fewer but more relevant results. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
n2n_update_contextD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectPath | Yes | The absolute path to the project or any subdirectory within the project. | |
| confirmNewProjectRoot | No | MUST be provided ONLY when initializing a new project. Set this to the 'detectedRoot' path returned by the server's confirmation request. | |
| activeTask | No | Current task being performed | |
| status | No | Current project status | |
| reason | No | Reason for current status (especially if BLOCKED) | |
| nextSteps | No | Planned subsequent actions | |
| lastCommit | No | Hash or message of the last relevant git commit |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
Each tool targets a distinct operation (add, delete, create, read, search, update) on specific resources (entities, observations, relations, graph). No overlap in purpose despite missing descriptions.
All tools follow the consistent pattern 'n2n_<verb>_<noun>' using snake_case. The verb choices are clear and the noun targets are explicit.
12 tools cover the typical operations for a memory/knowledge graph server without being excessive or sparse. The scope feels well-balanced.
The set covers add, delete, and read operations for entities and observations, plus relations and graph exports. Missing update operations for some resources, but the core workflows are present.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Give your AI agent a persistent map of your project's structure, dependencies, and bugs.
Project memory, semantic code search, and grounded agent context.
Durable, shareable and governed project memory with smart triage and explicit project composition.
Shared memory for coding agents. Stop re-explaining your codebase every session.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides a file-based, git-friendly memory store for coding agents to persist and recall project-specific lessons, bugs, and conventions via JSON files in the repository.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides persistent memory for AI tools by building a local knowledge graph from conversations, enabling cross-session recall and context awareness without cloud dependencies.9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides a local long-term memory layer for AI coding tools like Cursor and Claude Code, enabling cross-session, cross-tool sharing of project facts, user preferences, decisions, and workflows.252MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides persistent local memory for AI coding sessions, enabling agents to save and retrieve project context across different tools and sessions.MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/n2ns/n2n-memory'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server