Skip to main content
Glama
n24q02m

better-code-review-graph

by n24q02m

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}
logging
{}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
extensions
{
  "io.modelcontextprotocol/ui": {}
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
graphC

Build and manage the code knowledge graph. Actions: build (full_rebuild, base, repo_root), update (base, repo_root), stats (repo_root), embed (repo_root), export (format, output_path, repo_root), import (import_path, repo_root), summarize (max_nodes, repo_root). Use help tool for full docs.

queryB

Query the code knowledge graph for relationships, search, and impact analysis. Actions: query (pattern, target), search (search_query), impact (changed_files|base), large_functions (min_lines), spot_check (n -- random callsite snippets from last callers_of/callees_of/inheritors_of/importers_of result), renamed_in_diff (base -- symbols whose callsite line shifted vs base ref), diff (from_sha, to_sha -- nodes added/removed/modified between two commit SHAs). Use help tool for full docs.

reviewA

Generate token-efficient review context for code changes. Actions: context (default — auto-detects changed files from git diff, returns structural summary, impacted nodes, source snippets, and review guidance), delta (from_sha, to_sha — wraps the query.diff buckets and, when show_line_shifts=true, surfaces qualified_names whose line_start moved between the two commits for refactor auditing). Context params: changed_files (auto), max_depth=2, include_source=true, max_lines_per_file=200, base='HEAD~1', repo_root (auto). Delta params: from_sha, to_sha, show_line_shifts=false, repo, repo_root. Use help tool for full docs.

configA

Server configuration, status, and model-cell setup. Actions: status (show state), set (key, value -- keys: log_level), cache_clear (wipe embeddings), setup_status (state + configured model cells), setup_start (where the host configures keys), setup_skip (local mode), setup_reset (reset to local), setup_complete (re-resolve from host config). Use help tool for full docs.

helpA

Get full documentation for any tool. Topics: graph | query | review | config | security | recipes. Use when compressed descriptions are insufficient.

securityA

Security scanning over the code knowledge graph. Actions: scan (engine='heuristic'|'semgrep', repo_root), report (format='json'|'sarif', repo_root), suppress (rule_id, remove=false, repo_root), rule_list (engine='heuristic'|'semgrep'). Use help tool for full docs.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored across 6 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool covers a distinct functional area: graph management, querying, review generation, security scanning, configuration, and documentation. The action lists within each tool reinforce these boundaries, so an agent can reliably select the right tool for the job.

Naming Consistency5/5

All six tool names are single lowercase tokens (graph, help, config, query, review, security), following a consistent and predictable style. The naming convention is uniform and immediately understandable.

Tool Count5/5

Six tools is a well-scoped set that covers the server's domain without bloat. Each tool consolidates a meaningful set of related actions, keeping the surface area manageable while still being powerful.

Completeness4/5

The toolset covers graph building/updating, querying, diff analysis, review context generation, and security scanning. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct tool for managing review comments or code ownership, but the core workflow of producing code-review intelligence is complete.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessResponsive