Skip to main content
Glama
mzatylny

scopeguard-mcp

by mzatylny
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to scopeguard-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-policy-gateway

      jcorrego
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables policy-governed MCP interactions with deterministic authorization, tenant isolation, minimized PII exposure, and human approval gates for sensitive mutations, while producing structured audit events.
      3
      MIT

    • hachiman

      nidhish28guhan-netizen
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and MCP servers to operate under autonomous security enforcement, including pre-deployment scanning, per-call authorization, runtime monitoring, incident containment, and comprehensive auditing.
      1
      MIT

    • Cross Repo Ops MCP

      DHCross
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables secure, policy-controlled operations on local git repositories through MCP, including bounded reads, context-checked patches, allowlisted tasks, and guarded git operations.
      10
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: health for status, engagement lifecycle (create/revoke), scope checking, planning, header analysis, repository scanning, and audit operations (list/verify). Even the two audit tools are distinct in intent—listing versus verifying integrity. There is no meaningful overlap that would cause an agent to select the wrong tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (create_dry_run_engagement, revoke_engagement, check_scope, plan_assessment, analyze_headers, scan_repository, list_audit_events, verify_audit_chain). The only deviation is 'health', which is a noun instead of a verb_noun form, but this is a common exception for status endpoints and does not detract from overall readability.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools, this server is well-scoped for its domain of security assessment scope management. Each tool addresses a distinct operation without redundancy, and the count feels neither thin nor bloated.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool surface covers engagement creation and revocation, scope checking, planning, analysis, scanning, and audit verification. However, there is no way to list existing engagements or retrieve engagement details, which creates a gap in the engagement lifecycle. An agent cannot easily determine what engagements are active or inspect a specific engagement's configuration, limiting practical management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources