Skip to main content
Glama
mzaid007

Universal Poison Armor

by mzaid007
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Universal Poison Armor

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • InjectShield

      bch1212
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides tools to scan text and URLs for prompt injection attacks, protecting AI agents from adversarial inputs.
      MIT

    • goop-shield

      kobepaw
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides runtime defense for AI agents, protecting against prompt injection, data exfiltration, and other adversarial attacks through a ranked pipeline of up to 36 inline defenses and 3 output scanners.
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • genpark-prompt-injection-jailbreak-neutralizer-skill by alphaparkinc

      genpark-prompt-injectionofficial

      alphaparkinc
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables deterministic detection and neutralization of adversarial prompt injections and override attempts in AI agent workflows via a zero-dependency MCP server, providing structured telemetry and low-latency validation.
      7
      -

    • mem9-guard-mcp

      Riku-KANO
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides a guarded interface to the mem9 persistent memory backend, protecting AI agents against prompt injection, secret leakage, and memory poisoning.
      6
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct attack surface: single-document sanitization, dataset-level anomaly detection, and multi-source consensus verification. The descriptions include explicit WHEN NOT TO USE cross-references that direct the agent to the correct sibling tool, leaving no ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three tool names follow the same snake_case verb_noun pattern: sanitize_document, scan_dataset_for_anomalies, and verify_article_consensus. The verbs are specific and accurately describe each tool's core action.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is well-scoped for this specialized defensive server, with one tool covering each major poisoning vector: input text, training/retrieval datasets, and web-sourced consensus claims. Every tool earns its place, and there are no redundant or filler tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core defense workflow: sanitize untrusted input, detect poisoned clusters in datasets, and verify whether apparent consensus is authentic. A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated tool for reading or querying the security_audit.json log that all tools append to, but this is workable via external file access.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources