Skip to main content
Glama
mysleekdesigns

CrawlForge MCP Server

extract_text

Read-onlyIdempotent

Extract clean plain text or markdown from a static webpage by stripping tags, scripts, and styles. Use markdown output for RAG workflows.

Instructions

Use this for a page's plain text or markdown with tags, scripts and styles removed - the cheapest read of a static HTML page. Use output_format:"markdown" for RAG. Not for article pages (extract_content strips nav and boilerplate), JS-rendered pages (scrape), or when you also want links or metadata (scrape with several formats, one fetch). Cost: 1 credit. Example: extract_text({url: "https://example.com/article", output_format:"markdown"})

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlYesThe URL to extract text from
redact_piiNoRedact personal data from the text this call returns, before it reaches your context window. true means the free regex pass over EMAIL, PHONE, FINANCIAL and SECRET. The result carries redaction:{entities,count}. Default: off
user_agentNoOverride the outbound User-Agent. CrawlForge identifies itself honestly by default; use this only for targets you have your own agreement with.
output_formatNoOutput format: "text" (default) or "markdown" — use markdown for RAG workflowstext
remove_stylesNoRemove style tags before extraction
remove_scriptsNoRemove script tags before extraction
respect_robotsNoRespect the target site's robots.txt (default: true). Setting this to false is honoured, returns a warning in the response, and is recorded against your API key — it is your decision, not a silent default.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv6.0.0
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
    • addedInput schema / properties / redact_pii
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "properties": {
      +        "entities": {
      +          "description": "Which classes to redact, case-insensitive: EMAIL, PHONE, FINANCIAL, SECRET, plus PERSON and LOCATION when mode is \"model\". Omitted or empty means all four regex classes (and both model classes in \"model\" mode). An unknown name, or a model-only name without mode:\"model\", is rejected",
      +          "items": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "type": "array"
      +        },
      +        "mode": {
      +          "description": "\"fast\" (default) is regex only and free; \"model\" adds an Ollama NER pass for PERSON and LOCATION (+3 credits once per call)",
      +          "enum": [
      +            "fast",
      +            "model"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "replace_style": {
      +          "description": "\"tag\" (default) writes <EMAIL>, \"mask\" writes [REDACTED], \"remove\" deletes the value",
      +          "enum": [
      +            "tag",
      +            "mask",
      +            "remove"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "type": "object"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "description": "Redact personal data from the text this call returns, before it reaches your context window. true means the free regex pass over EMAIL, PHONE, FINANCIAL and SECRET. The result carries redaction:{entities,count}. Default: off"
      +}
  2. Changed2 schema fields changedv5.4.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / respect_robots
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Respect the target site's robots.txt (default: true). Setting this to false is honoured, returns a warning in the response, and is recorded against your API key — it is your decision, not a silent default.",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / user_agent
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Override the outbound User-Agent. CrawlForge identifies itself honestly by default; use this only for targets you have your own agreement with.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv5.0.4
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  4. First observedv4.10.0

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior, so the bar is lower. The description adds useful behavioral context: it strips tags/scripts/styles, targets static HTML rather than JS-rendered pages, costs 1 credit, and this is the cheapest read. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences with no waste: usage, exclusions, cost, and an example are all packed efficiently. The most important scoping information is front-loaded, and every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only extraction tool with 7 parameters fully described in the schema and no output schema, the description covers everything needed to select and invoke it correctly: when to use it, alternatives, cost, format choice, and a concrete example. Nothing essential is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3; the schema already documents each parameter thoroughly. The description adds marginal value by pointing out the markdown format for RAG and showing an example call, but it does not provide substantial meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States exactly what the tool returns: a page's plain text or markdown with tags, scripts, and styles removed, and identifies it as the cheapest read of a static HTML page. It also names sibling tools (extract_content, scrape) and the conditions that select them, so the agent can distinguish it from alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says when to use it (static HTML plain text/markdown, cheap read, RAG with markdown) and when not to (article pages, JS-rendered pages, or when links/metadata are needed), naming the alternative for each exclusion. The example call also gives concrete usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mysleekdesigns/crawlforge-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server