klydo-mcp
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@klydo-mcpfind stylish kurtas for women under โน1500"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Klydo MCP Server
Fashion discovery MCP server for Indian Gen Z.
Enables AI assistants like Claude to search and discover fashion products from Klydo โ India's Gen-Z quick tech fashion commerce platform based in Bangalore.
โจ Features
๐ Search Products โ Search fashion items with filters (category, gender, price range)
๐ฆ Product Details โ Get complete product info including images, sizes, colors, ratings
๐ฅ Trending Products โ Discover what's popular right now
๐ Structured Logging โ Debug-friendly logs with Loguru
โก Fast & Cached โ In-memory caching for quick responses
Related MCP server: Vistoya
๐ Quick Start
Installation
Option 1: Install from PyPI (Recommended)
# Using pip
pip install klydo-mcp
# Or using pipx (isolated environment)
pipx install klydo-mcp
# Or using uvx (no installation needed)
uvx --from klydo-mcp klydoOption 2: Install from Source
# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/myselfshravan/klydo-mcp.git
cd klydo-mcp
# Install dependencies with uv
uv syncUsage with Claude Desktop
If installed via PyPI (pip/pipx)
Add to your Claude Desktop configuration:
macOS:
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.jsonWindows:
%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"klydo": {
"command": "klydo"
}
}
}If using uvx (recommended for easy updates)
{
"mcpServers": {
"klydo": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["--from", "klydo-mcp", "klydo"]
}
}
}If installed from source
{
"mcpServers": {
"klydo": {
"command": "uv",
"args": ["--directory", "/path/to/klydo-mcp", "run", "klydo"]
}
}
}Then restart Claude Desktop.
Run Standalone
uv run klydo๐ ๏ธ MCP Tools
search_products
Search for fashion products.
Parameter | Type | Description |
| string | required โ Search terms (e.g., "black dress", "nike shoes") |
| string | Filter by category (e.g., "dresses", "shoes") |
| string | Filter by gender ("men" or "women") |
| int | Minimum price in INR |
| int | Maximum price in INR |
| int | Max results (default 10, max 50) |
get_product_details
Get complete product information.
Parameter | Type | Description |
| string | required โ Product ID from search results |
Returns: Full details โ images, sizes, colors, ratings, and purchase link.
get_trending
Discover what's hot rn ๐ฅ
Parameter | Type | Description |
| string | Category filter |
| int | Max results (default 10, max 50) |
โ๏ธ Configuration
Copy .env.example to .env and customize:
# Request settings
KLYDO_REQUEST_TIMEOUT=30
KLYDO_CACHE_TTL=3600
# Debug mode (set to false in production)
KLYDO_DEBUG=false
# API token for klydo.in (required)
KLYDO_KLYDO_API_TOKEN=your-token๐ Project Structure
klydo-mcp/
โโโ src/klydo/
โ โโโ __init__.py
โ โโโ server.py # MCP server entry point
โ โโโ config.py # Configuration (Pydantic Settings)
โ โโโ logging.py # Loguru configuration
โ โโโ models/
โ โ โโโ product.py # Product, Price models
โ โโโ scrapers/
โ โโโ base.py # Scraper protocol (interface)
โ โโโ cache.py # In-memory cache with TTL
โ โโโ klydo_store.py # Klydo.in API client
โโโ tests/ # Test suite
โโโ .github/workflows/ # CI/CD pipelines
โโโ pyproject.toml
โโโ README.md๐งช Testing
# Run all tests
uv run pytest
# Run with verbose output
uv run pytest -v
# Run specific test file
uv run pytest tests/test_models.py๐ง Development
# Install dev dependencies
uv sync --dev
# Run linting
uv run ruff check src/
# Format code
uv run ruff format src/
# Run the server locally
uv run klydo๐ค Contributing
We welcome contributions! Please see our Contributing Guide for details.
Fork the repository
Create a feature branch (
git checkout -b feature/amazing-feature)Commit your changes (
git commit -m 'Add amazing feature')Push to the branch (
git push origin feature/amazing-feature)Open a Pull Request
๐ Security
For security issues, please see our Security Policy.
๐ License
MIT License โ see LICENSE for details.
๐ข About Klydo
Klydo is a Bangalore-based startup building quick tech fashion commerce for Gen-Z (18-32 age group). We're making fashion discovery seamless, fast, and accessible. This MCP server extends our platform to AI assistants, enabling natural language fashion search.
Backed by innovation. Built for Gen-Z. Made in India. ๐ฎ๐ณ
Made with โค๏ธ in Bangalore, India
Available Tools
3 toolsget_product_detailsA
Get complete product information including all images, sizes, and specifications.
Args: product_id: The product ID from search results (the 'id' field)
Returns: Full product details with: - images: ALL product images from multiple angles (show all to users) - image_url: Primary product image - url: Buy link on klydo.in (may be null โ only show when present) - sizes, colors, description, specifications - Returns None if product not found.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| product_id | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It details return fields, null handling for 'url', an instruction to show all images, and notes that None is returned for missing products. This fully discloses behavioral traits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with Args and Returns sections. It is slightly verbose but every sentence adds value. Could be more concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With only one parameter, the description covers input, output, and edge cases. The presence of an output schema does not reduce need for description, and the description provides helpful usage hints.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% coverage, but description compensates by explaining that product_id is 'The product ID from search results (the 'id' field)'. This adds meaning beyond the schema type.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Get complete product information including all images, sizes, and specifications.' The verb 'Get' and resource 'product details' are specific. Implicitly distinguishes from sibling tools (get_trending, search_products) by focusing on a single product ID.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description specifies that product_id comes from search results, providing context for when to use the tool. It also notes return behavior (None if not found). However, it does not explicitly compare with siblings or state when not to use this tool.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_trendingB
Get currently trending/popular fashion products.
Args: category: Optional category filter (e.g., "dresses", "shoes", "tshirts") limit: Maximum number of results (default 10, max 50)
Returns: List of trending products sorted by popularity. Each product has: - image_url: Direct CDN image link (always show this) - url: Buy link on klydo.in (may be null โ only show when present) - price, brand, name, category
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | No | ||
| limit | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the burden. It explains the return structure and sorting by popularity, but does not mention error handling, authentication, or side effects. The guidance on when to show fields adds value.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with Args and Returns, front-loading the purpose. It is concise with no superfluous information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple with 2 optional parameters and an output schema. The description covers purpose, parameters, and return fields with actionable details (e.g., which fields to always show).
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, so the description fully documents both parameters: category (optional, examples) and limit (default 10, max 50). This compensates for missing schema descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves trending/popular fashion products, with specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings by implying curation vs search, but does not explicitly contrast with 'search_products' or 'get_product_details'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explains optional filters but provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like search_products or get_product_details. No context on when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_productsA
Search for fashion products on Klydo.
Args: query: Search terms (e.g., "black dress", "nike shoes", "cotton kurta") category: Filter by category (e.g., "dresses", "shoes", "tshirts", "kurtas") gender: Filter by gender ("men" or "women") min_price: Minimum price in INR (e.g., 500) max_price: Maximum price in INR (e.g., 2000) limit: Maximum number of results (default 10, max 50)
Returns: List of matching products. Each product has: - image_url: Direct CDN image link (always show this) - url: Buy link on klydo.in (may be null โ only show when present) - price, brand, name, category
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | ||
| category | No | ||
| gender | No | ||
| min_price | No | ||
| max_price | No | ||
| limit | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Discloses return structure, null conditions for url, and search behavior. Adequate for a read-only search tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Well-structured with Args and Returns sections, front-loaded with purpose. Every sentence is informative, no fluff. Concise yet comprehensive.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Output schema exists and description explains return fields thoroughly. Covers all aspects of a search tool with multiple filters. Complete and self-contained.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage on parameters. Description compensates fully with detailed explanations, examples, and defaults for each of the 6 parameters, adding significant meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states tool searches for fashion products on Klydo, with specific examples. Distinguishes from sibling tools like get_product_details and get_trending by focusing on search.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Description provides clear usage context with examples for each filter parameter. Lacks explicit when-not or alternative tool guidance, but sufficiently implies search vs details/trending.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
3 tool updates
v0.1.6- First observed
get_product_details - First observed
get_trending - First observed
search_products
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: searching, getting trending products, and retrieving full product details. No overlap or ambiguity.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (get_product_details, get_trending, search_products), making it easy to predict tool function.
Three tools is appropriate for a focused fashion product server: search, trending, and details. No unnecessary bloat or missing essentials.
The set covers core operations (search, browse trending, view details). Minor gap: no explicit way to list categories or brands, but search and trending cover most use cases.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Search and get fashion products recommendations across multiple e-ecom stores
Fashion product discovery and virtual try-on via the Glance catalog
MCP server for building and testing AI agents with multi-model experimentation and insights.
MCP server for VC pitch-deck scoring, thesis-fit matching, and deal-flow management.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for TryOnfy - AI virtual try-on platform that lets you preview clothing, hairstyles, and accessories instantly.8 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThe Vistoya MCP server gives AI agents direct access to a curated, multi-brand fashion catalog. Agents can search by structured filters, discover products through natural language, find similar items, and retrieve full product details โ all over a single Streamable HTTP connection.10 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA fashion vertical MCP server providing tools for product SEO audits and trend analysis to integrate with AI agents like Claude, Cursor, and Codex.2-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProduction-grade MCP server for Indian agriculture and utility workflows, enabling crop advisory, weather checks, mandi prices, and railway utilities through natural language.MIT