Skip to main content
Glama
mvg777

PostureCheck MCP

by mvg777
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to PostureCheck MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • BasicSec MCP Server

      marlinkcyber
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables DNS and email security analysis through passive and active scanning capabilities. Provides comprehensive domain security checks including SPF, DMARC, DNSSEC validation, MX record analysis, and SMTP connectivity testing.
      MIT

    • Email Deliverability Audit API

      Br0ski777
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Audits email deliverability configuration for a domain, checking SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and MX records, returning a score and recommendations.
      MIT

    • NEL VEIL MCP

      NELPROINC
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform passive security scans on domains, checking email spoofing (DMARC/SPF/DKIM), TLS weaknesses, security headers, exposed files, and subdomain-takeover risk without needing an API key.
      7
      47 npm
      MIT
    • @guardbee/mcp-ssl-inspector by GuardBee

      @guardbee/mcp-ssl-inspectorofficial

      GuardBee
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive TLS security audits for any domain, including certificate validity, expiry warnings, cipher suite weaknesses, deprecated protocols, and HSTS checks. Supports single and bulk domain inspection via MCP tools or a CLI for CI/CD integration.
      1,065 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools share a common domain, but scan_domain is clearly a broad assessment while check_tls and analyse_spf are deep dives. Overlap exists, but the descriptions effectively guide selection for specific use cases.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (scan_domain, check_tls, analyse_spf). The verbs differ but the structure is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is lean but appropriate for the narrow scope of domain security posture. It avoids bloat, though a few more specialized tools (e.g., for DKIM/DMARC) could round out the set.

    Completeness4/5

    The broad scan_domain covers email and web security comprehensively, while check_tls and analyse_spf provide deep dives for two key areas. Missing are specialized deep dives for DKIM and DMARC, but those are still accessible through scan_domain, so it's a minor gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources