create_bamboo_specs_yaml

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It only states the tool 'generates' and 'creates' a file, but does not specify whether it overwrites existing files, any required permissions, or potential side effects (e.g., rate limits, destructive actions). This is insufficient for an agent to understand the tool's impact.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with a brief purpose statement followed by a detailed Args list. It is front-loaded and each sentence adds value. However, the Args section is somewhat verbose; while necessary for parameter clarity, it could be slightly shortened by grouping related info.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 8 parameters (4 required), no annotations, and an output schema (true), the description covers the generator's purpose, parameter details, and usage suggestion (commit to repo). It does not explain return values or error behavior, but the presence of an output schema partially mitigates that gap. Overall, it is fairly complete for a file generation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, so the description fully compensates by listing each parameter in an Args section with clear explanations (e.g., 'project_key: The Bamboo project key (e.g., 'PROJ')'). This adds significant meaning beyond the schema's bare property names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Generate a bamboo-specs YAML pipeline configuration file' with specific verb and resource. It also mentions 'creates a complete bamboo-specs/bamboo.yaml that defines CI/CD pipeline', distinguishing it from sibling 'create_bamboo_specs_java' which likely produces Java-based specs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context: 'This file can be committed to the repository to configure the plan via Bamboo Specs.' This indicates when to use the tool (to set up CI/CD pipeline via YAML Specs). However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or provide alternatives beyond the sibling tool name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.