List images
list_imagesList all local container images as JSON to inspect available Docker images for use in sandbox environments.
Instructions
List local container images as JSON.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
list_imagesList all local container images as JSON to inspect available Docker images for use in sandbox environments.
List local container images as JSON.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true. The description does not add any additional behavioral context beyond what annotations convey. It does not contradict annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, highly concise with no extraneous information. Front-loaded with the core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple list tool with no parameters and annotations present, the description is minimal. It does not specify the structure of the JSON output or any other details, which would be helpful given no output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has zero parameters, so schema coverage is effectively 100%. The description does not need to add parameter details. Baseline for 0 parameters is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states the tool lists local container images as JSON. The verb 'list' and resource 'local container images' are specific, and the format 'JSON' is mentioned. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like list_containers.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention any context, prerequisites, or situations where other tools would be more appropriate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mustafaTokmak/container-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server